this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
131 points (99.2% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4244 readers
65 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pleat1752@feddit.uk 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Organic Maps is better for "normal" users if you ask me. Osmand is better for pro users but quite clunky.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, Osmand is definitely clunky by comparison. But the UX is getting slowly more intuitive. I see no reason why Osmand's easy-peasy defaults mode cannot end up equal to to OM. They're not far off, and at that point its superiority would be clear as day.

Personally I wish the OM devs could have contributed their talents to making Osmand better. Really feels like wasteful duplication which benefits nobody benefits except the egos of a handful of developers. A common problem with FOSS and this is a great example IMO.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I wish Organic maps would add some of the features from OsmAnd. I want the ability to select a part of the map to avoid.

[–] przmk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Did osmand change its rendering engine to make it as smooth as OM?

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Something changed to that effect a while back, yes. OM continues to look and feel a bit better (possibly a subjective experience) but it is so feature-poor by comparison.

[–] przmk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I just tested it again on my Fairphone 5 and it's still slow. I'm not talking about the UI but the rendering of maps. Unless they somehow manage to fix that, it'll keep being a poor experience.