videos
Breadtube if it didn't suck.
Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.
Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.
There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.
A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.
view the rest of the comments
This is the exact outlook I hold. "AMAB" and "AFAB" are not descriptors; they're events.
I have seen people, even those who are non-binary themselves, using these terms to generalize. People who do this shit tend to have a caricature of what an "AMAB enby" and an "AFAB enby" look like in their minds, so what they hope to gauge when they ask a non-binary person their assigned sex is whether or not they have certain traits (that they base their understanding of off of these caricatures).
For instance, people creepily assume that "AMAB" and "AFAB" are automatic indicators of what kind of genitalia a person has, but this is obviously very flawed. I've observed that individuals often misinterpret non-binary people as simply being "spicy cis," which significantly contributes to the repackaging of bioessentialism into "woke transphobia" when these terms are used. Unfortunately, this not only causes erasure to non-binary people who do medically transition, but even for non-binary people who don't, the generalizations are not always going to be accurate because they're often influenced by patriarchal, essentialist brainworms in the first place.
The way people use the terms "male socialization" and "female socialization" (which he talks about in part 2) are also concerning because it not only pushes an unnuanced false dichotomy, but it's a great demonstration of how lacking in intersectionality queer spaces can be. So much went into my socialization that go far beyond the sex I was assigned at birth: being a racial minority, being born into an immigrant family, being neurodivergent, the temperament of my family when it came to reinforcing gender roles and traditions in general, their devout Catholicism, and how all of this ties into what people "expect" me to be like even though that expectation is pretty much always entirely different from what I actually am.
Even in queer and leftist spaces, I feel like it's so common for there to be at least a sprinkle of essentialism in most discourse pertaining to gender to an extent that I actually have to avoid a good deal of it just for the sake of not getting triggered and being made to feel like a "freak" who doesn't understand societal norms, which is unfortunately inevitable with all the erasure that happens in this discourse.