this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024

30 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

829 readers

9 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml

QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml

yogthos@lemmygrad.ml

30

Can someone please explain this to me? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Someone was saying that even if using machines becomes cheaper than using humans, capitalist will still use humans because

"automation constitutes constant capital and human labour is variable capital

The Tendency for the Rate of Profit to Fall disproves that fact"

What do those mean?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I completely agree with how you approached it, the quotes you provided gave me pause when I first read them. Although in context I'm quite sure Marx really wasn't thinking about AI, I have no explanation for his choice of words. If I had to speculate, I'd suggest that he didn't think some tasks (e.g sorting by colour) could be done without some measure of intelligence, but that's just one idea.