this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
108 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

37826 readers
450 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987

The sheriff said Tesla CEO Elon Musk helped the investigation by having the truck unlocked after it auto-locked in the blast and giving investigators video of the suspect at charging stations along its route from Colorado to Las Vegas.


What if this hadn't been purposeful but an accidental blast... and the doors auto-locked someone inside? Do you need Musk's personal cell number to be able to get out alive? What even is this?

Seriously, how are Tesla's not widely considered dangerous deathtraps at this point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndeterminateName@beehaw.org 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wait, so after it exploded it was still working enough for Tesla to remotely open the doors and download the camera footage?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 27 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Why is it recording the passengers and why does tesla have remote access?

[–] IndeterminateName@beehaw.org 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

God only knows, I'm just impressed it still functioned after exploding.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] IndeterminateName@beehaw.org 5 points 6 days ago

We need more well built fridges

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Every car brand does this. Tesla is pretty close to unique in allowing owners to opt out, but nearly no one does

Tesla uses attentiveness data as part of their safety assessment of drivers for setting premiums for Tesla insurance as well as to ensure the driver is watching the road while the car is driving itself

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago

Perhaps so. I've only driven old second hand cars that have no smart features, and lesson cars that had the cameras removed. That's unfortunate to hear

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Teslas always are, not even joking. It's supposed to ensure the drivers are "attentive", but it is angled to record the entire interior/ "cabin".

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-682FF4A7-D083-4C95-925A-5EE3752F4865.html

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I hope taping over them does not turn off the car

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Obstructing the cabin camera will cause the car to periodically “nag” the driver to apply torque to the steering wheel while the automatic steering system is engaged, depending on the vehicle’s speed

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Ahh, ye fair enough. I think that's a better indicator of the driver being awake than a camera.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I have learned anything about safety features. They probably do.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago

If that's the case, I wonder how tesla is going to defend knowingly selling a vehicle that leads to innattention

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

The computers and telemetry systems aren’t near the part that exploded. Assuming they failed at all, they (and the vehicle itself) probably would’ve remained functional for a while after the blast