this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

564 readers
142 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What a weak ass response to threats of annexation. Like, as much as I'd hate to fight for Canada, I'd love to fight America.

[–] SupFBI@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What kind of war would NATO members even be able to wage on the US? I guarantee you all of your US built "defense" technology would be disabled as soon as anything kicked off. Any such adversary would be a sitting duck.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago

Username checks out, and while that may be true in that America could for sure fuck us up, they also did that to Afghanistan and Iraq and Vietnamese etc without even the harder goal of full annexation. They just wanted a government that was beneficial in power which is already the case here. Afghanistan and Iraq had a lot more to lose and were less comfortable in the first place, chances are it'd be through soft power annexation happens anyway but regardless America is really bad at winning wars.