this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025

163 points (98.8% liked)

chapotraphouse

13640 readers

902 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

PaX@hexbear.net

163

Age gap discourse has unironically gone too far (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 days ago by hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Power dynamics. Do you disagree?

It's hilarious because interracial marriage should be absolutely banned under that logic, as would wealth-gap disparity and

wait

heterosexual marriage would be banned too

was the pedophile witch-hunt a secret GAY psyop all along?

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Exactly!

I would always say that to my radlib ex that would argue against age gap relationships because there were "power dynamics"—I swear to God, sometimes I truly wonder if she was LiberalSocialist—but she was a conventionally attractive White woman with a good career who made way more money than me, a broke POC with no career. Like, how can people not see the logical conclusion of this?