this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
187 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
282 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the question then becomes "what happens when the services refuse". Because the next step up is getting their ISP to kick them off.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The next step should be law enforcement: they can contact the service, and escalate to the judicial system if it refuses to act, which can decide whether to order the ISP to block the service, or close the company completely, or even jail the people behind it.

The ISP does never need to listen to, or even hear about, a problem with a service.

[–] greenskye@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This feels like shutting down road access to the local stripmall just because the bar there doesn't properly handle it's drunks. Oh and leaving that decision up to a private, not elected and not accountable citizen

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

It seems more like revoking the licenses of the bar owners necessary to operate a bar.