386
Fairphone 5 Released (shop.fairphone.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by baseless_discourse@mander.xyz to c/technology@beehaw.org

With 5 years of OS support and 8 years of security update.

Related threads:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mosthated@feddit.nl 33 points 10 months ago

I was exited for this phone, but as I said in another thread: I am a bit disappoited about the CPU and the substantial price hike, but most of all aqout the size increase. Is there any market research at all indicating that customers want 6"+ displays?

[-] irasponsible@beehaw.org 37 points 10 months ago

Is there any market research at all indicating that customers want 6"+ displays?

Unfortunately, yes. People who buy smaller phones are the people who buy a new phone less often, and small phones tend to sell worse than the big models (see S10e, iPhone 12(?) Mini) so don't get renewed. Would be nice if they did.

[-] NiklzNDimz@beehaw.org 13 points 10 months ago

It's so frustrating that this is true. I use devices until they're dead or at risk of serious compromise before getting another, but the only options are ones that I can't even hold comfortably with one hand. I'm seriously considering the Jelly 2 at this point.

[-] DJDarren@beehaw.org 6 points 10 months ago

I picked up a 13 Mini back in March, and will ride this bad boy for as long as I can, in the hope that Apple eventually release another Mini model.

So perhaps it’s true that we hold onto our little phones for longer, primarily because we’re waiting for another little phone to come along.

[-] sparkl_motion@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

This is so true. I had a 12 mini and upgraded to the 13 mini in December. The battery is better, and I plan on keeping this until the next mini phone arrives. (If any)

[-] HumbertTetere@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

For the FP4 they said one of the reasons they remove the aux input was that more people asked them to reduce the size of their phone than to keep the input.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 15 points 10 months ago

The CPU choice is great, why are you disappointed with it? It's the reason they can offer a minimum of 8 years of support on this model.

[-] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I would also like to know what the problem is with the CPU. My current phone has this CPU and it works fine.

Edit:

Geekbench FP4 Vs FP5 https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/compare/2432096?baseline=2439889

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 17 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately I think a lot of people just have zero understanding of how the smartphone industry works. They think small manufacturers like Fairphone just have free reign to get whatever parts they want, offer updates for however long they want, etc.

The reality is that Fairphone have to find a way to work within the system that has been created by big tech. That means selecting parts based on their suitability for the long-term support goals they have. It's one of the reasons why the specs are mid-range, because these parts stay in circulation for longer. For example, the 4 had a very generic 60 Hz IPS notch display because it was a widely used panel within the industry at the time. Now that higher refresh rate OLEDs have become more common on mid-range devices, Fairphone has been able to put one into the 5.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

You have a Qualcomm QCM 6490? Google told me, there is basically no phone out there that uses it, because it's an IoT SoC, not one made for phones.

[-] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago
[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

How did you end ab with that phone? I never heard of that company.

[-] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

I live in France, I wanted a phone with buttons that wasn't just an ODM with a different logo on it. It is an interesting company. I've had some contact with them. They are legit going to pull out of China and move production back to France. They uphold their 5 year warranty promise as well.

And, they update their stuff. I'm on Android 13 and apparently older devices are still receiving updates too.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

I'm getting some low-key Fairphone vibes there. Cool stuff!

[-] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

It would be pretty low-key. I wouldn't want to pry this phone open and then glue it back together. Fairphones are supposed to be rather easy to repair.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that's true. I meant the software support/warranty aspect.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 8 points 10 months ago

With you on almost all points. Only the size didn't actually increase. The phone's dimensions are exactly the same. Only the weight went up a bit. The screen size was increased by using up more of the phone's front side.

The phone is still a massive brick.

[-] noodlejetski@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago

substantial price hike

it’s €50 more expensive than the FP4 with the same RAM/storage configuration on its release (€650 fot 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage).

[-] srecko@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Also it's 3x cheaper than my pentium that i bought in 1997 and it has 3000x less ram than this. I know that we don't have that kind of exponential growth of hardware like we had 10 years ago, but still there is progress and it's expected to have a better product for the same price each generation.

[-] NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

It's roughly the same size as the Fairphone 4, isn't it? Like 1mm less thick.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 10 months ago

I get that they wanted to increase the battery and put out a new cpu, but I'm disappointed they're not offering any camera or screen upgrades for my Fairphone 4.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 10 points 10 months ago

Were you actually expecting that? No manufacturer has ever created an upgradeable smartphone, let alone one as small as Fairphone. The Phonebloks concept died ages ago.

The situation with the camera on the Fairphone 3 was unique and mainly in response to problems with the original module. It shouldn't be taken as evidence that they have the ability to do this with every edition of the Fairphone, or extend upgrades to other areas like the display.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 10 months ago

Fair enough. Framework is definitely able to do those sorts of upgrades, but laptops are a lot more standardized than phones.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

That's the focus of Framework's business. Fairphone is a lot more focused on improving working conditions, pay rates, reducing environmental footprint, etc. The modular design is really more of a side-effect of that last bit rather than the reason the company exists.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
386 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
278 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS