this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
106 points (93.4% liked)

Be sure to read the rule before you leave

1073 readers
3 users here now

Rule 3: If you visit MoreTankie196, you are contractually obliged to post before you leave

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anuvin@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gramsci is pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci? I think maybe you meant someone else perhaps? Or maybe I am just missing something.

[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just think his analysis speaks for itself you know.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx

[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades)

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work