this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
99 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19775 readers
3524 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Protest voters did not meaningfully impact the election

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump won with 1% of the vote.
35% of registered, eligible voters stayed home. If 1% of those that stayed home would have voted we would be in a different world right now.
Protest voters are absolutely to blame for this.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College

Its not as simple as you'd like it to be.

I really thought everyone would have learned about the electoral college by now, but the important thing is making sure people understand our system moving forward.

Every single nonvoter in Cali could have held their nose and voted D, it wouldn't have changed the result at all

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you actually want to look at the numbers of who stayed home in 2024 after voting in 2020 then those demographics were the older white men/women and hispanic men. Probably because both those groups have a harder time stomaching a woman with the exact same policies

The people protesting the Zionists' war were college students and under 30s, who voted the exact same they always do.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Non-voters sure as shit did impact the election.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cool less than half the voting age population votes in the US.

And it has always been like this

So whining about the people who never vote and will never vote isn't helpful

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This election was an existential threat to democracy. Anyone who was able to vote and didn't vote for Harris, the opposition candidate, is to blame. The Democrats who stayed home because of fucking Gaza even moreso. We Harris voters knew this shit would happen because we pay attention. Anyone who voted for trump to send a message needs to do the same. There was 0 chance a trump presidency would turn out well for the Palestinians in Gaza.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Keep telling yourself that I'm sure it will make things turn out different next time.

Meanwhile I've been waiting for young people to actually vote since I was 18.

Waiting on poor people to vote in their own self interests.

Still waiting.

Meanwhile you're being tricked by propaganda into hating poor and young people.