this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
348 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem claimed on CNN that Americans "can't trust our government anymore," acknowledging distrust while defending Elon Musk’s access to sensitive federal data.

When host Dana Bash pointed out, "You are the government," Noem agreed but claimed that Musk is authorized to help find government inefficiencies.

She downplayed concerns over his access to Social Security and federal student loan data, insisting the audit is necessary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 129 points 1 day ago (2 children)

claps back

slams

blasts

The sooner this kind of phraseology disappears from media the better. Any outlet using it has become a clickbait shitrag.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Idk I think we should lean in. If politicians are going to be treated like sports, let's make some trading cards with the senators stats on them. /s

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want it to be like NASCAR, with the sponsors being plastered all over their shirts. "Here comes the newest senator on the scene whose biggest sponsors include Big oil, big medicine and Russia!!"

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This needs to be a legal requirement. I don't care about the patch jackets but disclosing political sponsors in an obvious fashion should be required of all political candidates or office holders at all times. They work for the people, not the other way around, and the people need better visibility of this.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You joke, but GPT comes up with some bangers for UK politicians...

.

UK Politicians Trading Card Game

A satirical take on British politics, styled like a mix between trading cards and Cards Against Humanity.


John Prescott – Trading Card

Card Title: "Two Jags, One Punch"
Type: Labour Tank

  • Power: 9/10
  • Charisma: 5/10
  • Policy Success: 6/10
  • Scandal Factor: 7/10
  • Verbal Clarity: 2/10

.
Special Ability: "The Left Hook of Justice"

Once per game, if an opponent plays a hostile media card, Prescott may respond with a Swift Uppercut, instantly negating the attack and leaving journalists dazed.

Quote:

"The Green Belt is a Labour initiative and we intend to build on it."

Flavour Text:
A heavyweight in both politics and physical altercations, Prescott served as Tony Blair’s deputy and made headlines for his blunt approach to diplomacy—particularly when it involved egg-wielding protesters. He was famous for his commitment to public transport… while owning two Jaguars. :::


Tony Blair – Trading Card

Card Title: "Cool Britannia's War Criminal"
Type: Labour Messiah (Corrupted Form)

  • Power: 8/10
  • Charisma: 10/10
  • Policy Success: 9/10
  • Scandal Factor: 9/10
  • Trustworthiness: -3/10

.
Special Ability: "Weapons of Mass Distraction"

If an opponent plays a Bad Press or Public Inquiry card, Blair may redirect all attention onto a vague existential threat, completely avoiding consequences for one turn.

Quote:

"Look, what we have to understand is… (proceeds to dodge the question for 15 minutes)"

Flavour Text:
Once hailed as the saviour of the Labour Party, Blair modernised Britain with a grin, a soundbite, and a suspiciously close friendship with George W. Bush. His legacy is a cocktail of public service reforms, spin-doctoring, and a certain little invasion that we swear was justified at the time.


David Cameron – Trading Card

Card Title: "The Pig Whisperer"
Type: Tory Toff

  • Power: 6/10
  • Charisma: 7/10
  • Policy Success: 5/10
  • Scandal Factor: 8/10
  • Competence: 4/10

.
Special Ability: "Referendumb"

If Cameron is forced into a difficult decision, he may trigger a National Vote, shifting responsibility onto the public. However, if the outcome is catastrophic, Cameron immediately Resigns to a Nice Cottage in the Cotswolds.

Quote:

"We're all in this together—well, apart from my friends in the City."

Flavour Text:
The man who gave the UK its most chaotic decade since World War II, Cameron's legacy is austerity, that referendum, and that alleged incident with a pig. Thought he could handle populism—turns out he couldn't even handle Boris Johnson.


[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On mobile and lazy, else I would have made this more Batman-like.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

It's horrible, I love it

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

At least this actually is clapping back. I'm still waiting for all the eviscerations of shitty senators I've been hearing about for years.