this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
160 points (99.4% liked)

Slop.

357 readers
45 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Look what he did to Twitter. I don't think he has the slightest clue of what he's doing and is likely a pawn of someone else playing him. Maybe a bit of XI, maybe a bit of Theil. His companies constantly manage him by playing to his ego. Dude's a billionaire puppet.

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

He destroyed one of the most effective tools for dissenting against government propaganda? He may have wanted it for a PR coup but his actions do serve his purposes quite well no?

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Respectfully, since when has it ever been that? Color revolutions? CIA shit. In the US, it regularly suppressed Bernie supporters while amplifying DNC talking points. DAPL and indigenous struggles were regularly silenced. If you're implying he is 4d cheesing this shit. No, I'm not buying it in the slightest. That doesn't match any of his history. Matter of fact, and I have nothing to back it up, but I'm still of the opinion that he was likely convinced to buy Twitter by Theil, knowing he would crash and burn it.

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He is the exact character you see like that. A man that couldn't possibly succeed at his own plans if he went off leash. So yeah, that he is a tool to be used would fit perfectly. I couldn't say that any particular move is such. However knowing each move could be such means that despite being a fool he can't be dismissed as one.

However, untill TikTok it was. And they have sunk their claws into that also. Without Twitter we wouldn't have this site for example.