this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
408 points (88.1% liked)

Science Memes

15726 readers
2703 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
408
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago (4 children)

There are plenty of arguments to be made against direct air capture, but entropy isn't one of them. Nobody ever claimed this is some kind of perpetuum mobile.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is a joke.

While physically possible DAC is a waste of money and energy compared to effective measures such as constructing solar farms, batteries and power lines. Even hydrolysis may look attractive.

[–] Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago

At the latest after decarbonization of the power grid (yes I am laughing as I write this), we will want to remove CO2 from the air which was emitted 50 years ago. Also I would like to point out that the IPCC scenarios about reducing global warming already include carbon capture. Plans to remove CO2 from energy production till 2035 already only work under the premise that we actively start removing CO2 from the atmosphere simultaneously.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)