this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
155 points (97.0% liked)

movies

2764 readers
306 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Just saw the trailer, I like the tone, hope it’s good.

I’m still mad at snow piercer… why the fuck do they need to be constantly moving? That’s the worse thing for heat insulation!

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago

It's not exactly hard scifi

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 12 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Snow Piercer is not about a train. It's about capitalism, communism, revolutions and anarchism. The train is the capitalist world and the final message is anarchist.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, complaining about the science of Snowpiercer is kind of like complaining that the animals in Animal Farm talk

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on which Snowpiercer you're watching. The movie is about the revolution. The series is about lazy people fucking up the working system.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay sure but can’t you have all of that without the train?

Imo a bunker would be a much better metaphor, especially since Ed Harris’ character believed their world was eternal (it was hard to believe it was running for that long).

I like the director and his critique on capitalism but imo he did it wrong. Especially give that the ending…

Tap for spoiler…was the self destruction of humanity, given the train crashed, not anarchy.

Imo the movie would have been semi saved if they just showed a tribe of Eskimos at the end, not a polar bear.

That would be perfect, it would show that humanity would live on, but clearly the capitalistic system that was preserved on a train was self destructive and always meant to crash.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

But you can't "derail" a bunker. And the point of the ending was that neither capitalism not communism are the answer.