this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

Public Health

984 readers
54 users here now

For issues concerning:

๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@mander.xyz
otter@lemmy.ca
89
Why Cancer Warning Labels for Alcohol Are Long Overdue (www.psychologytoday.com)
submitted 5 months ago by TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works to c/publichealth@mander.xyz
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Alcohol is the third leading preventable cause of cancer in the United States, following tobacco and obesity. While 90 percent of Americans know tobacco causes cancer, fewer than half realize alcohol does as well. Like tobacco warnings, alcohol warning labels would help consumers make more informed health choices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] De_Narm@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

While I'm in favor of adding a label, I don't think it would change much of anything. If you're really health conscious, you probably don't drink already and most other people would presumably say stuff like "everything causes cancer these days" or "my grandfather drinks daily and look how healthy he is".

If I remember correctly, even putting NSFW warning images on cigarettes didn't do much.

[โ€“] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'd much rather force manufacturers to use plain packaging (white label + black text in a standard font). Make it look as boring as possible with large warnings. Colors and branding have a very significant effect on sales - why else would labels have designs?

It will certainly also make it seem less normalized for children. Right now alcohol packaging is hardly distinct from some soft drinks.

[โ€“] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Labels work, but they're not a cure-all.

Ask why police don't track the number of arrestees who are intoxicated. On the rare occasions (1998) it was tracked it was like 40%. And that's just alcohol.

[โ€“] aaron@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

sadf

[โ€“] azi@mander.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

Fun fact: while all the other packages have gory images on them, the "smoking causes impotence" ones show a floppy cigarette

[โ€“] De_Narm@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I never questioned the effectiveness in terms of teaching the consumer. As I've said, I'm in favor of that and it's great.

However, people tend to continue their consumtion despite better knowledge. At least I remember this being the case with cigarettes. So it does almost nothing for the general health of your population. As others already mentioned, plain labels, a ban on marketing and similar actions are probably far more effective.

[โ€“] aaron@infosec.pub 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

asdf