News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I think letting everybody have a gun is absolutely moronic. But if i was living in the US right now i would definitely be stocking up on assault rifles and ammo.
I think you'd be better off with one, and spend the change left over on more ammo. You only have two hands.
Maybe I'd find some people to use the other ones.
Valid.
At current gun ownership rates in the US, every willing person who wanted a gun could be issued one instantly if enough people were willing to share.
An assault rifle just tells everyone you can't aim and are happy with indiscriminate targeting. They are fine when you are fighting 1000 of something, but there's a reason the army sharpshooting badge doesn't include burst fire (or didn't thirty year's ago, anyway).
I'd recommend just about anything else for self defense, actually.
I can't because of some mental health concerns in my household (not the least of which, my own), but otherwise I'd have a revolver.
I keep a cavalry company of winged hussars in my back yard. Fuck with me and get lanced mofo!
Tell me you've never shot a gun, without telling me you've never shot a gun
Qualified expert with an M-16. Which also implies I've fired an M-60, but that's not really relevant to the discussion.
(Pointedly) Yeah, we know.
I'm not thinking about self defense against some burglar. I'm talking about self defense in the sense the US gun nuts have been talking about for decades. Now that tyranny has actually arrived, they're very quiet all of a sudden. Who would have thought.
WWI more than a hundred years ago demonstrated conclusively the military worthlessness of a bunch of dudes armed with rifles, when faced with the real elements of state military power: artillery, tanks and airplanes. The US government has no fear of a bunch of fat old dudes with closets full of peashooters.
Oh yes, on an open battlefield against declared combatants, absolutely. However, that's not how it's going to go down in the US. This is where we get to dredge up that old quote about a rifle behind every blade of grass.
Take a look at any "anti-insurgency" operation in the last ~80 years or any situation that devolved into door-to-door warfare in a city full of both nongovernment combatants and also where basically every single civilian also hates you and your army. Except in our case about a third (32%) of those civilians are armed.
Even if only half of those civilians are on our side, we'd outnumber the entirety of the US police and military forces combined by a little over 13 to 1. Nobody wants to fight a war of attrition and I'm not recommending one, but the fascists would have to achieve an unrealistically ludicrous k/d ratio to succeed. There's no way around it other than this would outright require indiscriminately blowing up large sections of their own cities and infrastructure to get us, surely killing a handful of combatants each time but also taking out at least double their number in uninvolved civilians.
That sort of thing does not tend to go any way towards making the rest of those civilians left get less involved.
TBH I don't think us Americans would actually have the stomach to be on the receiving end of anti-insurgency operations in the way that, say, the Vietnamese and Afghan people were - enduring 20 or 30 deaths for every oppressor killed. Also, I don't know that very many of us would understand the need to handle all communications and organizing without using social media or the Internet at all. Today's fascists have tools of social control that were undreamt of in the past.
That must be why they beat theTaliban so decisively.
This situation absolutely calls for rifIe usage. Tell us you know nothing about firearrns without telling us..