this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

913 readers
81 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Magicicad@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That’s crazy. It’s almost like poverty alleviation is far more successful than thinly veiled 21st century Jim Crow

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yep. The main thing to remember here is that this wasn't always this way. China used to be much more dangerous in the late 80s and throughout the 90s. The huge improvement in material conditions came with a very noticeable reduction in crime. It wasn't simply a matter of better policing or surveillance. Even anti-corruption efforts could not have succeeded without the material basis improving across the whole of society. This is like a perfect case study that confirms what leftists have always been saying, which is that you don't solve crime with punitive draconian measures, but by lifting people up out of the conditions that create crime. That and having a society that is less focused on the individual and more on social "harmony" as the Chinese would say.