News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Musk called a guy a pedo because he was angry they didn't use his solution to save kids that would have died if they had waited for him. That was in 2018. Wanna bet most Tesla on the road were sold after that happened?
Musk was shit way before the current events, people still supported him financially.
It's expensive to ship anything to my state (alaska) so amazon is pretty much the only choice.
I mean... No, Amazon shouldn't exist? What's the point you're trying to make here?
I'm just pointing out that there's a shit ton of people that just decided to ignore the fact that Musk is a moron that has no business managing a multinational company and none of them deserve compassion now that they suddenly realize that maybe they shouldn't have bought a car from him.
People might not have had enough principles to care about the pedo remark, it doesn't make them right or good people. People purchase plenty of shit from evil companies, does it means what the companies do isn't evil? No. It means people are idiots.
So you agree there's no reason to be doxxing them.
I was replying to the "people bought these cars before Musk became an idiot" part only.
So you're ignoring the entire point just to be pedantic?
There's the doxxing part and the date of purchase part, which was a way to give weight to the first part. I just corrected a mistake made by the OP regarding the date of purchase, I never said anything about if I approve of doxxing the owners or not.
And I am specifically asking you, given your comment I replied to, if you approve doxxing the owners or not.
And I'm not answering because it's not related to this part of the conversation, but you can go ahead and talk about that with others since you seem to want to share your feelings on the subject.
So ignoring what's actually being discussed and just being pedantic. Got it.
No, I replied to something that was being discussed, for some reason you're just mad that it wasn't the part you wanted me to talk about.
If you didn't want to talk about what I brought to the table then you shouldn't have replied to me, simple as that.
I replied asking you a specific question that you refused to answer. If you didn't want to answer the question I asked you shouldn't have replied to me instead of trying to dance around it. Simple as that.
Why would I answer a question unrelated to my message?
Why would you respond to a question you have no interest in answering?
What question are you referring to here? Because so far I've only replied to the questions I felt like replying to.
https://lemmy.ca/comment/15444806
I replied what I had to reply to that.
So you're ignoring the entire point just to be pedantic?
Oh you want to restart the conversation? I'll just block you now.
Buhbye!
Oh noes!
Acknowledge Polerviking’s meat!