this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
459 points (94.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30834 readers
2532 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

~~Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion~~

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (17 children)

I believe antinatalism is a dire mistake, and the highest thing someone can aspire to be is a parent

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

On, that's easy to address. You don't need to have kids as long as you're improving society so that other people's kids thrive.

Now we're inclusive of the infertile and accomplish the same goal.

But I also agree, fucking is the best

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 24 points 6 days ago (3 children)

antinatalism is gross but I don't think the highest aspiration is parenthood

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

antinatalism is gross

Why so?

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Have kids, find out. Spoiler, it is, for most people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nuxleio@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah that part.

[–] HotCoffee@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago

Oooeh this is one is gonna piss off a lot of lemmings. This is one of those hard echo chamber topics that haunt Lemmy.

Also don't mention religion, that will also twist a lot of panties on here

[–] amon@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

imo u don't necessarily have to be a parent, you can be a parental figure to a younger person, be a good role model and teach them well

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I believe that its pointless to argue this way or that about antinatalism, as we no longer have control of a population encroaching 8 billion. It just becomes a moot point to bash each other on over the internet (which can be said about a multitude of other subjects).

I'm not going to have kids. That's just what I want. Going extreme on antinatalism or pronatalism is just circling back to telling other people what they should do with their bodies. Everything is just so extreme these days. Its do or die in the eyes of the public, no matter what you do, and its grating.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The debate shows… the next generation it’s OK to have strong feelings both ways?

(initially I was going to make a point that seemed on shaky ground given search engines exist - “not everyone has formed their opinion yet” so for those [young] people, just check out a couple opposing books from the local library and that’s sufficient? Ooooh, what about when they want to debate what they read! Ground feels less shaky!)

[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

It really all boils down to "live how you want as long as you're not bothering others". If you believe heavily in it, then live by it, but stop slamming it into the heads of people who believe the opposite or just don't care.

It's part of the reason why younger gens cringe at religion. "Do this or you will go to hell, but do it through us because you'll go to hell if you do it through another religion." It's enough to make anyone balk, and rightfully so. The ground is always shaky, it just doesn't feel as shaky if you shake with it.

...Now I want a shake.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well obviously if you're fully antinatalist you're basically working towards human extinction.

But I think that a healthy society includes a few child-free people. In fact, as someone without kids, I'd happily pay a much higher tax rate so that parents can stay home with their kids. I doubt I'd be a good parent anyways, and so I'd prefer to contribute to society in ways people with families can't.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But I think that a healthy society includes a few child-free people.

Regardless of one's views on antinatalism, we absolutely need to acknowledge that not everyone is suitable for parenthood. I'm not suggesting that we (as a society) impose restrictions on it. Rather if someone self-selects for not having kids, people need to STFU and accept it rather than trying to shame or pressure them.

Thank you. I did not have kids for a number of reasons, and I can assure you the world would not be a better place if I had. But I do always enjoy people telling me my life is pointless, haha

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Why is it the highest thing someone can aspire to? You don't think being a Nobel-winning scientist is as important as being a parent?

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 2 points 5 days ago

and the highest thing someone can aspire to be is a parent

Be a good parent.

Far too many out there are shit, or at best mediocre parents.

If you're going to say the church, the school, the neighbors, other family members, anyone else is who should raise your kids, you should aspire for a vasectomy.

If you aspire to just pump out kids for a number game, you missed the Dark Ages. Though a Mennonite community may be your thing.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Im not too judgemental of most anti-natalists but the ones who claim having kids is bad for the planet can fuck right off.

I hate this myth. The world can absolutely support a large human population IF we arent all living the same hideously wasteful lifestyle. We need to change our consumeristic shitstain of a culture. Blaming population growth is just a means to justify continuing to live wasteful lifestyles and not having to change anything.

Its literally just placing a higher value on consumerism than human lives. Its gross.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Antinatalism is a mistake - I think I agree there, mostly because it's a path to a narrow gene pool and increases the probability of extinction.

Highest aspiration being parenthood - hard pass there, the highest aspiration in life is the seeking and sharing of knowledge.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Lol you should work for an online ad agency.

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

How many kids do you have?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I agreed with this up until the 'and'.

load more comments (2 replies)