this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8448 readers
290 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's always puzzled me and reading a thread on reddit just how has reignited that puzzlement. Someone on reddit asked people opposed to universal healthcare to explain why and the conservatives in the thread have given reasons like they don't want to wait their turn for treatment, and that people don't have an intrinsic right to live, along with the usual "WHY shOUld i PAy fOR YouR HealTHcarE?"

Christians seem to lead the charge with objections such as these. And in my experience of asking for help accessing food, Christians were the cruellest and the least likely to help.

I just don't understand how someone claims to follow Jesus but holds beliefs like this. When Jesus handed out the loaves and fishes, did he check everyone's employment and tax status first, and only feed those who were working and paying tax? When he healed the sick and disabled, did he make sure they had health insurance first and refuse to treat those who couldn't pay?

What makes these people such incredible hypocrites?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] porcupine@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m not aware of any modern self-identified Christian denominations that can show evidence of having existed continuously since before the Catholic Church, which is generally accepted to have originated in the 1st century CE.

I was raised in an American evangelical Protestant tradition (you probably know the one), so I’m familiar with the argument that (for example), the English King James Bible is the one true literal word of god that predates both King James, the English language, and the Catholic Church. I’m not here to tell you what your spiritual truth is, but as a Marxist with an evidence-based perspective rooted in historical materialism, I don’t find any of the retroactive claims of modern Protestants to be the “true” or “original” form of Christianity any more or less valid than Mormons deciding in the 1830s that they’re actually the original Christians and settled North America in 600 BCE.

I’m not trying to belittle whatever specific faith you hold or tradition you practice if the material result is that you’re doing good in the world. I just wanted to share an outside perspective that, in the context of a post predominantly about the ideological origins of the more antisocial flavors of Christianity, claims from Anglophones that amount to “everyone else got it wrong, and I know what Jesus really said” sound absolutely indistinguishable from every other form of modern Protestantism.