News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
They weren't already? The US spies on its allies. And those allies spy on the US. That anyone would only be figuring this out now is kinda sad. Any foreign travel (for whatever definition of "foreign" applies to you), should be made with the assumption that someone will be attacking your electronic devices. If you don't need all of your personal/work data on the device you have with you, don't keep it there. If you do need some of that data, have a way to get it over the internet, preferably using a VPN but at least using encryption. For the extra paranoid, you'll need a way to verify the OS, applications and certificates of the device accessing the data. And that still leaves hardware based attacks as a risk.
Every country (with the capability) is spying on every other country at this point
With 14-eyes the EU sends their spying of its citizens directly to the US.
Two wrongs make a right. That's how the saying goes, right?
If the speed limit is 55, but at the moment there's lots of traffic going about 80, it is legitimately more dangerous to stay under 55. To be clear, the law is unambiguously here, it's black and white. So ultimately it's your choice. You have to decide at what point is safety a higher concern than legality?
I would say... at some point.
Right! Right? Right.
There are two ways to really interpret that:
I used to do some work for the US government and even going to the frigging UK we would always have a "private meeting to go over logistics" a week or two before going over where we would be told that we need to request and use a burner phone and laptop. Never in writing because the UK was our closest ally but anyone who tried to bring their "real" work devices would rapidly be told that something went wrong with their paperwork and they can't go on that trip anymore.
That's an easy way to avoid going on trips then.
I don't know who you are but most people's threat model doesn't need to include a foreign government spy agency physically attacking their phones. That assumption itself is insanely paranoid.
Edit: Hello?? It feels weird to ask this are yall high profile government workers or else what makes you think foreign governements will be so interested in what you have in your phone?
This is a question no one should answer in a public forum
Fair, then let me make my point clear: most people don't have any reason to think they're in any more danger of getting hacked abroad than at home. And I strongly dislike how blatantly paranoid comments like the above one get so many upvotes on lemmy. This is the geek's version of doomsday prepping
Sorry, I wish this was the case but it's not. People entering the US have been getting their phones snatched by border guards who are under a ton of pressure to detain as many people as possible. Nobody should have sensitive information on electronic devices when they're passing through the border and if they need access to that information they should download it securely and understand that their device could still be physically compromised by someone.
The fact that that made the news shows that that's not a common occurance, not to mention that it was the guy's own government who snatched his phone, not a foreign spy agency.
Trump has been attacking anyone who supports Palestine regardless of if they are crossing the border or not. People really should be cautious when travelling to countries with authoritarian governments but that's not because they're crossing a border or are in a foreign country, it's the same caution that needs to be observed by anyone living in such a regime
it's not commonly covered by the news
I don't see what difference that makes
100% agreed, that article is focused on a particular place where people should exercise even more caution but people should be on guard the whole time they're under an authoritarian 's jurisdiction
No, borders are extra risky places where there is extra surveillance and more guards who could threaten you
Totally agreed
This isn't most people it's EU staff
I'm not talking about oop, I'm talking about the guy I replied to who said: