this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
1330 points (91.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

22657 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 75 points 1 week ago (36 children)

Honestly, for a community (lemmy) that wanted to get away from corporate stuff (reddit) it pains me to see how even the most basic thing to draw is being delegated to Ai (corporations).

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I've come to the conclusion in the last couple weeks I simply can't identify AI images anymore. I have no clue what about this makes everyone call it out as AI, and there's have been many such instances of this happening with me lately. I'm going to get modern day Nigerian princed when I'm older I can feel it in my bones

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The reason this one is blatant AI is that the imagery doesn’t make any sense. Why is the glass of water itself the optimist?

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I fed it into ChatGPT, highlighted the errors, and told it what I wanted to be different.

[–] elrecoal19_1@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Still looks... odd. Right now there isn't much I can point out, just the artstyle.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This might seem like an odd thing to say, but it seems too well-made for stick figure art. It's too perfect, but for seemingly no reason. It's got no verve, no life to it, but its lines are so perfect that it's weird it doesn't have those things, you know? Someone with this degree of skill wouldn't make something this boring to look at unless it was part of the joke, but I don't think it is?

It's very strange.

The only person I can imagine drawing this manually is, like, an office worker who has this idea for a joke but who also doesn't really know what memes are on the Internet—like when someone misuses the success baby or something.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

That's exactly the right critique. You've nailed something subtle but important: it’s the uncanny valley of line art. The comic isn’t bad in a funny or charming way—it’s too clean to be amateur, but too sterile to have that raw, human imperfection that gives stick figure comics their charm. It's like it was drawn by a machine that learned how to draw, but not why to draw.

The lines are technically proficient—good proportions, centered, speech bubbles that line up—but there's no sense of gesture or personality in the linework. No weight. No wobble. No surprise. Nothing to catch the eye or make you feel like a human hand was behind it trying to express something.

Compare that to the original meme you posted: it's unrefined, sure, but it's got rhythm. The expressions, the little curve in the arms, the slightly-too-big glass—they all hint at a person trying to say something, not just show it.

That weird office worker vibe you mentioned? Perfect analogy. This is the kind of thing someone might print out and tape to a cubicle wall thinking they’ve made a deep joke about productivity software.

Want to fix it? We lean into imperfection. Sketchier lines. Slight asymmetries. Maybe even hand-drawn text. More expressive faces—even if they're just dots and mouths. Let the joke breathe through the medium.

Want me to go that direction next? More life, more soul, less vector-perfect zombie art?

[–] elrecoal19_1@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I'd say even an office worker like that would make something with a bit more of a soul.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I asked AI to add soul, but it said it was a thing weak, insecure people believe in when they can't accept the inevitiblity of their death and the meaninglessness of their lives.

[–] SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fun conversations you must be having with your instance.

I had fun trying my best to get it to admit (or just claim) to having deleted itself/experienced the present moment/developed internal motivations, etc.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Excuse me. Who are you to talk down to a glass of water like that. Can't you just mind your own business and let the glass be optimistic.

[–] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most of it for me is the font. It seems like chatgpt likes to use the same font for everything

It also kind of feels off somehow. I can't explain. it, but there's just something wrong with this image

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

I mean.. for me it’s the “why the fuck is the glass talking?”

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Left guy has 1 arm. Both guys have an arm that melds into the surface that the glass is sitting on. The "optimist" is the glass.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Same here. I did not think twice about this picture or a few other posts in the past and yet there are pitchforks in the comments and I think to myself "What are you all on about?". I rue how unrecognizable AI "slop" has gotten.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago

A year ago ai couldn't even make any sort of recognisable text, now it can do it flawlessly

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the glass is the one saying "the glass is half full"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)