this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2786 readers
1907 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Federal law enforcement ultimately reports to the president, not the judiciary. Maybe that was a mistake, but there is nothing the judiciary can do within the system if the executive refuses to enforce against itself. Maybe they could go outside the system but, so could you.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They have marshalls for that. Perhaps what this is showing us that the marshalls need some reforms

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We’ve lost the chance at reform. It’s just gonna be 100 years of authoritarian rule.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago

I don't agree that it's locked in, but we are certainly at the presupace. You and I are still talking about this without significant fear of the secret police knocking down our doors, so we aren't there yet.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago

The Director of the United States Marshals Service answers to the president. They protect the judiciary, but they aren't it's police force.