this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
702 points (99.3% liked)

[Moved to !iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev, check pinned post.] iiiiiiitttttttttttt.

871 readers
444 users here now

you know the computer thing is it plugged in?

Moved to !iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatyrSack@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Would this probably work if you connect to their Wi-Fi?

EDIT: I am smart, I promise

[–] zdanger@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Localhost denotes the device itself. It would work if your phone were running a web server with the cafe's menu hosted on it

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I almost said yes, but no, localhost is your own device. If it was a 192.168 ip it would be different.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

I'll know it's the future when I start seeing http://[fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]/ link fuckups.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But their subnet is 10.1.1.0/24

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Crazy to me how rarely people use 10 over 192.168

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

It was weird, it was like one day I woke up and suddenly everybody else was using 192.168.1.0/24

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Listen, you’re in good company. I literally almost posted this and then I realized. Made my day that I wasn’t the only one.

Also, it’s amazing that someone made QR codes with a localhost URL.

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

You'd still go to localhost, so realistically: no.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Probably.

But ugh. What’s wrong with a printed, laminated menu‽

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IT technician here, without modifying the hosts file on your computer it won't work.

You can assume that this will never work on anything other than the development box, regardless of what network you are connected to.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

without modifying the hosts file on your computer it won’t work

Wouldn't be surprised if even that didn't work - localhost resolving to something that isn't the local host is the sort of thing that'd get blocked by browsers as a security exploit.

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Up vote for the interrobang!

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I like these digital menus.

For large groups they're so much better than all coordinating when you're ready to order, ordering, and later working out how to split the bill.

They also let you order in your own time, no need to have someone hovering waiting for you to be ready, or not be there at all.

Though my experience is that they're mostly used at pubs and clubs, where they replace ordering at the counter, rather than table service.

The worst thing is that they always ask for a fucking tip. Shitty companies trying to import even shittier American bullshit.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

None of that has anything to do with digital menus and everything to do with ordering online.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 40 minutes ago

But that's what this is about. Cafes and restaurants replacing or supplementing paper menus where you order by telling a person what you want, with digital menus where you order by going through the online system.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Digital menus that supplement the paper menus and in-person servers are fine.

Digital menus that are the only option and are used to surge price are garbage

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Theoretically, it would be cheaper for the company if they do new menus frequently. A lot quicker too, potentially.

Being this incompetent it's more expensive....