this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
654 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

22780 readers
1005 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 80 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I've actually found C# quite pleasant to develop with, so long as I didn't have to worry about targeting non-Windows platforms.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 34 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

It's fully cross platform with .NET Core and later.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

What does fully cross platform mean? It sounds very vague and a lot like an exaggeration.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 11 points 10 hours ago

It was even before through mono/xamarin

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

True, but what I’m really talking about is the unbeatable user experience of having an application that looks and feels as if it were a native Windows application, because it is and has that first-class platform support straight from the vendor.

With that said, most new cross platform applications today are probably more like electron or Web apps.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, there's no such thing as native Windows apps for Linux, but there are cross platform GUI frameworks like Avalonia and Uno that can produce apps with a polished identical experience across all platforms, no electron needed

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Qt is my favourite, though it's not .NET.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Good lord, I've never seen anyone say this in public. I used Qt Creator for a couple of years and I found the combination of C++ for under the hood and Javascript for the UI to be a fantastic way of ensuring a nearly nonexistent base of developers who could competently do both. Maybe they grow on trees in Finland, I dunno. And maybe you're talking about some other "Qt", I also dunno.

I've done C# and Java extensively as well and I would never choose Qt over them. I might choose Qt over Objective-C, however.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

QML is such an awesome UI language, the only thing (that I know of) that comes close is Jetpack Compose.

The flavour of JavaScript QML uses is very different from regular JavaScript, it's literally a glue language and any significant non-UI logic should be done in C++.

And Qt C++ is very different to most other C++ framework (or how people usually write pure C++), it feels much more Java-inspired.

Anyway, it really is a great UI toolkit if you want something powerful, cross-platform and efficient.

I suppose Qt's cross-platform aspect is a big checkmark in the plus column. My own opinion of Qt is probably colored by the fact that I was forced into it against my will and that the Finns who initially wrote the app were unhelpful and downright hostile to my attempts to customize it in ways that their customization framework did not support.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Yea this was a crosspost and also just a meme, but C# is my fav

And really cross-platform has come a LONG way...just as long as you don't need UI on Linux lolol

ASP.Net Core is a phenomenal backend.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 11 points 10 hours ago

Not really, even GUI is going strong, check Avalonia UI.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Or realistically on Mac. Mac Catalyst is neat but you’re basically building an iPad UI and afaik that’s all that MAUI supports still

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah C# gets a bad rap. I spent a decade developing in C++, and Java before switching to C# because of program requirements. Now I never want to go back.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

C# development was spearheaded by Anders Hjelsberg, one of the brains behind Borland Delphi/Object Pascal.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Does it get a bad rap outside of this meme? I've only heard praise. It's by far my favorite language

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's IMO getting a bit oldish, it's nice for small projects (up to medium sized I guess, after that I don't see the benefits over say C/C++ but that's just my opinion) but there are a lot of improvements that could be done I think.

The language is open source IIRC, so it could be done I guess, like C/C++ has new versions every some years.

[–] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I have used many languages in my 25 years of programming. C# is the best.

I've used many languages/platforms in my 30 years of programming (take that!), including Visual Basic, C, C#, Java, Objective-C and C++. I agree that C# is the best but not by much. They all do pretty much the same things - if one language lacks something that other languages have shown to be beneficial, that something tends to get incorporated in a future update in some form or another, and their glaring weaknesses tend to get corrected as well (like when Objective-C mostly did away with the need to explicitly release fucking everything).