this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
236 points (98.0% liked)

World News

46344 readers
3298 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was three weeks after Christmas when the bombshell letter arrived. Guy Shahar and his wife, Oksana, looked at each other in stunned disbelief.

They had followed the Guardian’s investigation into the carer’s allowance scandal that has left thousands of families with crippling debts and criminal records. Not once did they think they would join them.

“Important,” it read in big bold type. “You have been paid more carer’s allowance than you are entitled to. You now need to pay this money back”.

In some weeks, she was paid just 38p more than the threshold – but for that tiny infraction she is being forced to repay £64.60 each time, the rate of carer’s allowance at the time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 42 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The same report released in May found the DWP had known since 2021 that overpayment of Carer's Allowance has left some people in financial difficulty.

Remind me when were last general elections again? Another conservative mine they left hanging about by sweeping it under the rug.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20jln81w72o

Not a fan of labour but please give credit where its due, as to which government did nothing first.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The government currently in power is fully responsible as they could stop it entirely, they choose not to and are complicit.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

"Fully responsible" huh? Like on day 1, or is there some sort of grace period? How long does a gov have to review all historic legislation? Is your timeframe based on empiric evidence or hopes and dreams? Why aren't the individuals who wrote and passed it "fully responsible"? Or does their culpability end the moment they vacate office?

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Last I checked the current UK Government have been in for nearly a year.

They would have been aware of this legislation when it passed as it’s not like the politicians are born on election day.

A current majority government is always responsible for how the government is running.

[–] Yermaw@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago

Bureaucracy moves pretty slowly i think. We've got another few years to find out for sure.