politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It's going to keep happening until someone gets fed up and sticks some of them in the ground.
OTOH - First amendment. Unless they behave violently, nothing that can really be done.
Hate speech absolutely is protected by the first amendment.
Citation needed. Hate crimes are a thing in US law, but hate speech is not.
What's not protected are threats and incitement to violence. Nazi demonstrations are both.
This is incorrect. Hate speech does not exist in the US on a federal level.
If I key your car and write "go back to [place] you dirty [racial slur]" I will get charged with vandalizing your car and an increased penalty because it's a hate crime.
But if I'm not committing a crime I can go around saying all sorts of hateful things and the 1st amendment protects me. That same sentence from above can be freely said with no legal penalties.
They do have the First Amendment right to march and wave their flags around. Now, if all major political parties quickly denounced them and the police treated them as the potential threats that they are, then their "peaceful marches" would be ridiculed and they would be driven back into the shadows.
The bigger problem isn't that they have a First Amendment right to march. It's that one of the two major political parties watches them match and says "these guys have some good ideas." Instead of being driven into the shadows of society, they are being given positons of power. And we've seen what happens when Nazis are given power.
You know nothing about US law.
They probably passed the Lemmy Bar exam.
Not how it works. The first amendment explicitly allows you to disagree with the founding philosophy of the country. In fact it's sort of the whole point.
My opinion? It's better to have these guys out in the open where you can see them. If you try and suppress them by shutting down their protests or arresting them you have
A) opened the door for the government to do that with any radically perceived movement in the future. Any leftist protest movement could easily be shut down under similar pretense
B) you turn the guys into martyrs for the cause. Just like Trump's indictments improved his polling numbers, these Nazis would likewise see a surge in popularity.
C) suppressing ideas doesn't make them suddenly go away. You just push it underground where it becomes even more radical without the moderating influence from the mainstream.
Why are people becoming open Nazis? Consider the source of the problem. The worse the economic situation is historically, the more radical people become. Florida has the highest inflation in the country, relatively low wages and relatively high cost of living.
It's not a coincidence that the Nazis came to power right after the Great Depression. We need to fix the economic situation and fast.
You might not like him or disagree with him but if he was a nobody you wouldn't have an opinion on him.
The government should not be the arbiter of truth. Do you trust the FBI? Do you trust the CIA? You think they are the good guys? The dozens of coups all across the world? The endless spying and surveillance?
You're advocating that these people should have even more power over you.
To avoid cockroaches, you stop leaving food and water in the open. Turning the lights off and scurrying them away won't help the issue.
We need to solve the economic issues to get rid of Nazis. Anything else is just turning the lights off. As long as people are struggling to pay bills and have a sense of instability and fear for the future... we're going to have fascists. It doesn't matter if you make it so they can't speak in public. They will just speak in private and continue to grow.
We need broad ranging economic reforms.
Give me specific examples. I don't follow what you mean.
Have you ever actually dealt with cockroaches? They survive nuclear blasts. You need to remove the source of food and water otherwise all the traps in the world don't make a difference. You leave one or two alive and they will just repopulate.
Plus consider the implications of what you're saying. Let's say we arrest and imprison every single Nazi. What's going to happen? The ones that remain are going to stay real quiet, aren't they? What then? Is the government going to be actively spying on every single communications in the country to try and find them?
That's what it'll take. And maybe it'll even be possible. But consider what you have created. A massive surveillance state with broad ranging legal powers to detain and imprison "enemies of the state". What happens when a far-right party gets elected? Remember, we are a democracy. What happens when the next Trump gets elected and says BLM are fascists?
Actually, we don't need to imagine. If you look at his recent interview with Tucker Carlson that's exactly what he said. He said the fascists are out to get him.
You don't see any potential issues with this? None at all?
Honestly, we're screwed. Unfortunately I think your wish will ultimately become reality and we will live in a brutal authoritarian surveillance state. I'm just glad I got to grow up before it became that way.
Nazis believe in the genocide of a racial group. Genocide is not normalized in the USA. It was not normalized by the Telecommunications Act.
Can we stop saying crazy things that didn't happen?
Christianity has nothing to do with fascism. It can be used by fascists, sure. But if you look at Nazi Germany for example Hitler hated the church and there's speculation he had plans to totally destroy it. Fascists don't like groups of power that aren't controlled by them. So for example the Catholic Church had to go. He tried to create a Protestant church called the "Reich Church" that was sort of a state religion but once that failed he gave up and suppressed the religious movements.
I would just like to quickly point out you said it was built on the idea that all are created equal
The Constitution was written in 1787, put in effect in 1789
The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves was signed in 1807, and the 13th Amendment in 1865
Women gained the right to vote nationally in 1920
Just because they said all people are equal, does not mean they actually thought all people are equal.
Are threats protected by the first amendment? I think there's a legitimate argument to be made that flying a nazi flag is inherently threatening. It says to me that that person wants to hurt me, that they will hurt me if I give them the chance. It is threatening enough to cause me fear, to cause me to change my behavior for my safety. Why should public declaration of their desire to hurt me br protected speech?
You would be shocked at what's covered under the 1st amendment. The language has to fall under a "True Threat" definition in order to not be covered.
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1025/true-threats
More:
https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/core-first-amendment-rights-are-implicated-in-this-supreme-court-case-about-true-threats
Tbh I'm not surprised at all. I'm well aware that, as a trans woman, I have no right to safety in America. Police, landlords, and employers have all made it clear to me that the rights of bigots to hurl slurs and threats at me supercedes my right to safety or freedom from harassment. When I worked at Walmart, multiple witnesses reported another employee specifically and directly threatening to cut me with a knife, a knife of a sort that was against company policy to carry on site to begin with. Because no member of management heard the threat and they couldn't quite see the knife on camera, they did nothing. Wait, I take that back, they reduced my hours so I would be in the building with him less. So yeah, I'm not surprised at all that threatening minorities is protected in America. I've been threatened and seen those people protected....
These are hate groups - they would love it if you killed one of them since it would justify their hate even further.