People Twitter

6917 readers

966 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1619

A study on tech literacy (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

373 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I have no idea how we go from OP to black women's genitalia and Linus Torvalds.

But if it's important to you to make sure people know you are a "philosopher", I'll let you go about your sophistry in peace. All us phllistines will just sit back in awe at how cultured and erudite you are.

[–] tetranomos@awful.systems 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

i'm drawing on the confluence of political circumstances involving spoofing identity in a post-identitarian world: https://infosecwriteups.com/the-curious-case-of-github-commit-spoofing-a-lighthearted-exploration-54ddbaaaf40a

dr. nash's article is about the politically loaded significance of linguistic practices/naming, not just "black women's genitalia", as a basis for analyzing the material conditions reflected in forms of gentrification.

you are enjoying the soft bigotry of low expectations, or to read her without the principle of charity. i have every reason to suppose you're intentionally weaponizing obtuseness/reductionist posturing.