this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)
Casual Conversation
3259 readers
308 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is only sort of related but I was talking to someone about the Medieval ‘dark ages’ and it led to us wondering what the ancient greek ‘dark age’ (proceeding plato et al) was like because it seems odd that civilization with such complex ideas about ethics and metaphysics and geometry sprang out of a dark age.
After digging in it turns out historians no longer really refer to it as a dark age (rather, they split this period into the ‘postpalatial bronze age’ and the ‘prehistoric iron age.’). The reason we considered it a ‘dark age’ in the past is because they didn’t really have writing, but historians realized this was because there was a strong oral tradition in that region at the time where ideas were passed through song/poetry etc. so the presumption that it was a dark age by historians in the past was mainly because historians had a bias towards literacy/writing. The oral tradition obviously doesn’t leave a written archeological record so it makes sense that historians privilege societies that had writing just because we can know more about their ideas, but it’s doesn’t paint an accurate picture of the past if we pretend complexity only comes with literacy.
A lot of the time, "dark age" pretty much literally just means that we don't have much information (i.e. because they didn't write).
I don't recall which of the Greek philosophers hated writing, because it would make it so people wouldn't bother to remember anything anymore.
Learning more about the Greek culture of the bronze age really makes me wish they didn't have such a big impact on western culture, given how misogynist and slave reliant they were. ACOUP has a great series of articles on how the real Sparta worked (a shithole place where more than half of the population were slaves, plus their warriors were just average)