this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1510 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18147 readers
4899 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Over three-fourths of Americans think there should be a maximum age limit for elected officials, according to a CBS News/YouGov survey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mudface@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Why don’t they just vote for younger people? Why does there need to be a law?

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

First past the post voting is why.

So many problems go back to that.

But in this case, committee assignment is based on seniority. So the longest serving members get first dibs. This means that to keep power, the parties must put money into keeping incumbents in place.

[–] Mudface@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m Canadian, we don’t have this problem. I don’t think they do in the UK or Europe either.

You guys didn’t either, until just more relatively recently. Feels gross, it feels corrupt

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

First Past the Post is an issue in Canada and the UK as well.

I tend to advocate for STAR, because it seems to be one of the best voting systems ever designed. Sadly, the people who were elected thanks to FPtP don't want to surrender power by switching to a better voting system. This is why you sometimes see these ghouls pushing things like Ranked Choice, a system that is only marginally better than FPtP, if you ignore some massive (and exploitable) flaws.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You need to read more news. Yes, you absolutely fucking have this problem in Canada. Why am I still hearing about Doug Ford, huh? And in the UK they have a different variance of problems, because they have passed about half of the reforms necessary to solve this.

[–] Mudface@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Doug ford isn’t 80 years old

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because older politicians are more established and have larger networks to support/bribe them.

[–] Mudface@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

But like I said, there are politicians in other countries too. This seems to be exclusively an American oddity

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Because seniority gets you the powerful positions. So its beneficial to a party and its constituents to keep the same person in place as long as possible so that they get the more powerful assignments.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because young voters don't show up to primaries.

[–] Mudface@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They probably should

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

We know they don't. It doesn't really matter why, unless you think there's some as-yet-unknown reason why it's actually a good thing that people vote that way

[–] Indyraps@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Our options are guys they fall upstairs and stroke out reading teleprompters. We don't get a choice of young people lol they get voted by in primaries not by voters but funding and politico. if they even make it there.