You have proof of it not being a conspiracy theory? Go ahead and link it. I'll check my account for replies. If the next reply to this isn't a link with irrefutable proof of the things you've said that people have (repeatedly) asked for proof (and in fact those that "googled" found evidence refuting your claims); we're done here.

Stop playing with rhetoric and link whatever it is you claim to have that 100% makes your case for you.

If you cannot, and if your reply to this never happens or doesn't contain the articles and evidence to support your claim, then you're a conspiracy theorist. That is exactly how that works. That's how conspiracies work. You just started one, and/or perpetuating one.

You don't even seem to grasp the difference between facts, and a conspiracy theory, so I suspect the kind of response I'll be receiving is:

1. Nothing
2. More personal attacks with rhetoric trying to shift the blame and burden of proof onto the people asking for it to cover for the fact that you are indeed perpetuating a made-up conspiracy theory without any actual evidence or facts.

So which one is it, #1, or #2 here? You could always try for the #3 option and post evidence to your claims, but you've had hours, and dozens of interactions to do that with people and you haven't yet. It would have taken you a fraction of the time to gather the data yourself and post, than whatever song and dance routine you think you've been doing to throw people off.

Something tells me you're not going to take door #3.