this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
473 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

6969 readers
2289 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Online dating is fascinating in how bad it is. It's like 80% the fault of capitalism, and 20% users just doing a bad job and making it worse. People write messages no deeper than "lol" and "nm hbu" and then wonder why they don't have any interesting conversations like on the tv

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because of the meta. If you show too much enthusiasm too fast, it comes off as a red flag. Thus the low energy game of conversational investment chicken.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

If you're actually trying to date, then enthusiasm being a red flag is itself a red flag. If you're just trying to hook up then yeah, follow "the meta".

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's kind of fascinating. and sad. It sounds kind of self-defeating- If the other person is reasonably well adjusted, they're going to take feigned disinterest as just regular disinterest, and move on. (Or think that the other person can't hold a conversation, and move on.)

Maybe this creates a self-selection effect where the people who are afraid of being enthusiastic eventually meet each other? That would probably be best for everyone.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is primarily an issue for guys, typically girls have way more matches. If your match happened to hit it off with someone else first, or they only check when they're drunk, or you just got lost in the sea, after a few times putting in effort and getting ghosted, you start to be a bit more frugal.

On the other side, you're used to being flooded with messages, so you never really have to put in much effort until things do start to get interesting.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

after a few times putting in effort and getting ghosted, you start to be a bit more frugal.

I see why that would happen but it seems like a self destructive strategy. The other person wasn't there for all your other attempts. This is your first interaction with them. If you half-ass it, all they see is you're doing a bad job at conversation. You only get one first impression with someone.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but after enough failures the defeat becomes demoralizing. I'm not saying it isn't self-destructive, but human nature frequently is.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, can't disagree with that.

When I give people dating app advice, I tell them if they don't have the emotional resources to full-ass it, delete the app. Half-assing it is likely going to make things worse.

But humans aren't rational creatures.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I wonder if this is the app, or the age group? As a late 30s guy on Hinge, I don't have a ton of trouble finding at least a few people to have a decent chat with every week, and it's led to a decent number of dates and even a few long term relationships.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

The opposite worked for me, but both of us were feeling like we'd try one more time then take a break. This was on OkCupid before they got bought out by Match.