this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1820 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

12014 readers
2535 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

Yes. Minimum wage is supposed to cover every basic living necessity at the very least - from rent to food to even a modest amount of leftover money meant for a bit of fun here and there. It's not supposed to allow a lavish lifestyle or allow one to eat at restaurants every day, obviously, but it should allow you to live modestly and support your household regardless of you living with others or alone.

So for these McDonald's overlords who live lavish livestyles thanks to the thankless work these workers put in, then why should they even work at a McDonald's in the first place? With inflation constantly rising and wages staying where they are someday even a McDonald's job won't be worth the hassle for the non-livable pitance of money they receive in return.

Down with overly rich billionaires living off other people's misery. If your business allows for you to live the most lavish and extravagant life while your workers barely have enough to make ends meet, you are not a successful businessperson, but a grifter to society and use your power to keep the status quo as it currently is. Flipping burgers on a McDonald's or working in garbage disposal are still essential jobs to serve society, and people are needed for them.

So they should still be properly valued and compensated as humans trying to live their lives while they supply the vital workforce for those same jobs - those positions have to be filled anyway and are of importance to society at large, so let's not pretend we don't need people for them and treat them like less-than-humans. Plain and simple - there's more than enough for the rich to still be rich and live their lavish lives while regular people maintain a satisfactory level of life, and no need to ghoulishly hoard all the wealth (in many cases through tax loopholes which should not be legal whatsoever) like they were gonna live eternally.

And no, I'm not a minimum wage worker, so with this I'm not advocating for myself, but for what's right for us as a society.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 32 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Right-wingers remind me of that meme template where the dog has the ball and it's going "Throw! No Take! Only throw!"

They want a thriving economy, but they don't want to pay people wages. No pay. Only spend.

[–] Ashenlux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's the part I don't understand. Why do they not realize that if you give people enough money to pay living expenses and then some, they will spend more money. What is the point of having all the money stuck at the top? A thriving economy requires money to circulate, but its getting caught between the same handful of greedy assholes. And they seem to just want to make the problem worse. If they do that, the economy will collapse and then all that money will be worthless anyway.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

Because the most wealthy people are hoarders. At that point it's a mental issue. They are it as a zero sun game and think having the biggest percentage of the pie means they win. They didn't care about making the pie itself bigger.

load more comments (1 replies)