this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
391 points (98.3% liked)

politics

23703 readers
2456 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

America was great when Americans cared for each other and the New Deal, by Roosevelt and the Democrats, helped narrow the inequality between the rich and poor.

MAGAts don't understand this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But if we do that now how will bankers and private equity buy their yachts!!!!!!??? Oh the humanity

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is straight up the problem. You cant reduce housing costs without reducing the price of houses. Individuals know this and reject housing development in their communities because they like to see line go up.

But if we want young people to ever be able to move out/buy a house, the price of houses has to fall.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The Republican strategy is to deport illegal immigrants and free up the housing they occupy, there by increasing supply and lowering demand.

The Democrat strategy is to build more low income housing and allow in anybody who wants to come here. Increasing supply slowly and increasing demand substantially.

Neither really push for a program to build low income housing and 1500sqft starter homes that are reasonably priced.

What is a starter home today is 2500sqft, and that is only because builders make more money on those than 1500sqft.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You forgot the increased subsidies for first time homebuyers in the democrat plan.

You are correct that neither party has proposed a solution that would help because neither party will admit that home prices need to fall, substancially.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Those subsidies are a fart in the wind against home prices inflated by artificial scarcity cause by passive income seekers and restrictive building codes that prevent low income and high density housing. It is like retailers giving a 10% discount for a week when they raise the prices 15%.

Such a weak and empty gesture to pander to voters. It is better than nothing, but that shouldn't be the bar they campaign on. Dems need to grow some teeth.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Absolutely. Subsidies just make the problem worse next election cycle.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

I'd challenge the word "illegal" in the Republican strategy, but I'm with the spirit of your post.