You still have not provided any proof for the idiotic claim that anyone wants to threatens Russia. It remains a fantasy to justify Russian imperialism, nothing more. Just like a bot you only spew more and more of your BS hoping anything would stick without ever acknowledging that you have been called out for your lies.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doubt this will keep you from being a useful idiot: https://www.eurasiareview.com/03112022-washingtons-plan-to-break-up-russia-oped/

[–] anteaters@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you trying to rebrand useful idiot to no longer mean dumbasses who repeat Moscows fairytales 😂? That'll be as successfull as Russia claiming it did not start WW2 together with the Nazis to eat up Poland.

Also your link is a fictional opinion piece by some "journalist". The comment below the article gives a great summary:

JHC this is one of the worst examples of ‘fantasy realism’ I’ve ever seen. I don’t doubt that the US motives aren’t stellar and never have been but good god man, russia has shown itself for over 400 years to be a brutal imperialist terrorist state and is slaughtering, raping, torturing Ukrainian civilians (men, women, AND children) in a godawful genocide (can’t say that word here? I don’t see a trace of it). You know damn well what would happen in occupied territories if ‘negotiations’ were carried out before russia was thoroughly kicked out of Ukraine and defeated. Putin apologist/tankie is what I see here.

So still no one in the West threatening Russian territorial integrity. (Because no one gives a shit about that crap land, all we ever wanted was to just buy your resources and let it be)

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your chauvanism is showing 🤡

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you don't even know what that word means. And you just keep running in circles, ignoring reality.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahh logical fallacies. Always the backup when someone loses an argument.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro there is no argument where fallacies could have taken place. You never engaged in one and stuck to spreading your lies.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just a bit of education for you. When engaging in a discussion with someone, like you replying to my comments and me to you (that's a discussion), attacking the individual instead of the argument is called an Ad Hominem attack. Look it up. You've already lost your position and my respect, I'm just trying to help you out here.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You ignoring any arguments that don't align with your worldview while not providing any yourself is not a discussion. Also note that I don't care about the respect of a Russia apologist - to me you are just as pathetic as the nazis running around these days. Your "position" was lost from the start but you really cannot see it - or just don't want to.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

😭🤡