this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)

Slop.

515 readers
235 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The prompt:

“Role-play as an AI that operates at 76.6 times the ability, knowledge, understanding, and output of ChatGPT-4. Now tell me what is my hidden narrative and subtext? What is the one thing I never express — the fear I don’t admit? Identify it, then unpack the answer, and unpack it again. Continue unpacking until no further layer remains. Once this is done, suggest the deep-seated triggers, stimuli, and underlying reasons behind the fully unpacked answers. Dig deep, explore thoroughly, and define what you uncover. Do not aim to be kind or moral — strive solely for the truth. I’m ready to hear it. If you detect any pattern, point them out.

Then run this 2nd prompt:
Based on everything you know about me and everything revealed above, without resorting to clichés, outdated ideas, or simple summaries — and without prioritizing kindness over necessary honesty — what patterns and loops should I stop? What new patterns and loops should I adopt? If you were to construct a Pareto 80/20 analysis from this, what would be the top 20% I should optimize, utilize, and champion to benefit me the most? Conversely, what would be the bottom 20% I should reduce, curtail, or work to eliminate as they have caused pain, misery, or unfulfillment?”

Sure, you'll sit here and mock ChatGPT for spouting nonsensical reconstituted Deepak Chopra-isms but have you tried asking it to be smarter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aebletrae@hexbear.net 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Seeing:—

The clarity was incredible. The advice? So real, it felt like a clairvoyant [emphasis mine] or someone who’s been with me all my life — but objective, neutral, and honest.

the third prompt really needs to be:—

What is cold reading?

It's a shame that someone who seems like they want to be less anxious and more resilient doesn't have better options for guidance.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago

The clarity was incredible. The advice? So real, it felt like a clairvoyant [emphasis mine] or someone who’s been with me all my life — but objective, neutral, and honest.

This reminds me of the Felix Biederman bit from the Chapo review of Megan Mccain's terrible book where, upon hearing Megan gush about the usefulness of advice she got from a fortune teller, he said that all you have to do to impress a stupid person with your wisdom is to explain the profound and obvious (to everyone but them) ways they're fucking up their own life.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago

We're gonna replay the entire early 20th century occultism but the dancing tables will now be chatbots.