this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
447 points (79.6% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7253 readers
132 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I have nothing but hate for people that breed problem dogs. Not just talking aggression. But a lot of races have very known medical problems.

Small short dogs very often get back problems. E.g. Corgis, yes they look cute. But very soon they will live in a world of chronic pain. That's not cool.

Don't even get me started on pugs or Chihuahuas...

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The animals we create are ALL entitled to the exact same unconditional love and protection as our own children. The hatred you feel over a pet being bred with a shortened lifespan or discomfort should be virtually imperceptible next to your rage towards those who farm and consume pigs, cattle & dairy, chickens & eggs, sheep & wool, turkeys, fish, and other vulnerable individuals.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

No. I will continue to be more upset over the animals we breed and keep in chronic, prolonged pain over the span of 12-15 years for no other reason than our own entertainment. Than I am over animals we raised for slaughter.

That doesn't mean i think cattle should be kept in deplorable conditions or be exposed to unnecessary stress.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago) (1 children)

What is your rationale? Are you saying that it would be better for those pets if we slaughered them after only a fraction of their natural lifespan (like the animals you have no such sympathy for) so they never encounter their genetic limitations?!

Chickens suffer the same sort of negative consequences of overbreeding, but to a degree orders of magnitude more severe. Why is it worse that a pug cannot breathe than that a chicken's bones cannot even support its own weight?

I suspect that the relevant difference is that you abuse chickens and wish to continue abusing vulnerable individuals who are chickens, but you've made the decision to stop abusing pugs, and so feel free to be critical about their treatment. Not to be unkind to you; that is just basic human nature.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 minutes ago (1 children)

Or the less insane idea of not breeding them in the first place.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago) (1 children)

Which, pugs or chickens? Surely if one, then moral consistency demands the other as well.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 48 seconds ago

No animal, be it pets or animals raised for slaughter, should live in pain or be exposed to unessesary stress.

That should answer your question.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago

Pretty much all purebred dogs will have a greater chance at health complications than mixed breeds.

Same goes for humans.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Or Frenchies. I briefly wanted one until I considered having to watch it struggle and suffer across its life.

[–] Obelix@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's also really stupid to buy dog breeds with known medical problems. Surgery for your dog is not cheap. Your loved pet will suffer. Buy another breed without known problems

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 hours ago

But X breed is so cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

snaps picture for instagram

[–] brewbart@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Generally agreeing, but as a Corgi owner just a small correction: They are short in height but have a long body. It's not a problem if the breed is small, the proportions have to be right.

Corgis, although at the border to a problematic ratio, the breed lines I'm accustomed with are still fine(Europe). Corgis tend to have back problems when not properly prevented their whole life - avoiding downward stairs, restricting jumping or anything in the direction of dog sports made for Aussies, etc. But due to their stockier build they are pretty robust against the typical problems you see in Dachshunds for example. It also helps that they're not hopelessly mis-bred yet

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

"The dogs are fine as long as they don't do stuff that dogs typically do".

Great stuff.