this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
321 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
502 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Piracy, in today’s context of unauthorized sharing of digital content, is wrongly condemned as immoral theft. However, it is not piracy itself that is immoral. Rather, it is the greed-driven laws and practices that censor knowledge and creative works to maximize profits. At its core, piracy is about sharing information and creative works with others, which should be seen as a moral good. 🤑

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can say capitalism is not important all you want. The fact is that people need money to feed their families.

If pirating was much more widespread, industries would die and workers would have no jobs. That's a fact.

The only thing stopping piracy from growing are laws.

[–] hitwright@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism is important, never said it wasn't. It actually gamifies our choices as producers, also helps by providing a metric of desires. The fact is people need food and it works well (we will ignore the subsidies on food production) to produce it and distribute it. The taxes works as a great tool to force you into the game. The problem pirates see, is that you can monopolize on a production of a product and ruin the game for all. For example when during a crisis someone starts selling water for 25 dollars a bottle due to being the only available provider at which point that is seen as unethical and stealing as ethical. So with this view people see it ethical, because there are tribalisism reasons why you more or less must have consumed a piece of media in order to fit in.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far, "fitting in" has been the worst excuse for stealing. So, can people go into an IShop and steal Iphones because they want to fit in?

Look, I don't care if people steal. Go, do it, I'm doing it too... But pretending it isn't wrong is such bullshit.

How is stealing anyone's effort and hard work fine? Just because the work can be duplicated easily doesn't mean that it didn't take a lot of effort to produce and should be sold individually.

Imagine telling a book author that they only sold a copy because everyone agrees copying and sharing his book was fine. It took him 5 years to write it. He'd probably kill himself. Again just because something can be duplicated doesn't mean it doesn't take work!!!

[–] hitwright@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far, “fitting in” has been the worst excuse for stealing. So, can people go into an IShop and steal Iphones because they want to fit in?

No, stealing an object is not copying my dude. I don't encourage stealing unless it's a basic human right ( water/food stealing for survival is another subject for example ).

How is stealing anyone’s effort and hard work fine? Just because the work can be duplicated easily doesn’t mean that it didn’t take a lot of effort to produce and should be sold individually.

Again copying is not stealing. I'm not disregarding he should not be compensated for his work. I'm against pay walling for people who can't afford the information. It's needlessly cruel.

Imagine telling a book author that they only sold a copy because everyone agrees copying and sharing his book was fine. It took him 5 years to write it. He’d probably kill himself. Again just because something can be duplicated doesn’t mean it doesn’t take work!!!

Imagine me writing a new book which basically is the same book, then going full on on ads and selling way more then the first guy. Then suing the first guy for stealing my ideas (disregarding the fact it was I who stole) and getting a monopoly on it. Then imagine it becoming a staple book on which everyone in an industry must have. Is it ethical to steal from me or not?

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the point of your last paragraph, are you saying that only certain pirating is ethical?

Because I agree it is OK in that particular scenario, but not everywhere. But people here aren't being this specific. And it is weird that you had to go to that specific scenario after I told you how piracy can destroy the life of a person.

[–] hitwright@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that there are cases that it's okay and ethical. That was the point from the beginning. Also that creative works are special and there should be a different way to compensate creators for them than to gate keep the poorest people from enjoying the media or getting crucial information for deepening their craft.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Streaming services are cheaper in India. Games are cheaper in India.

I'm not sure what gatekeeping you're talking about.

Also, imagine saying a top restaurant is gatekeeping people from quality food. Well, damn, quality music is more expensive to produce!! Quality books take longer to write!! Quality movies require millions of dollars!!