this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
335 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24105 readers
4103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ckmnstr@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm genuinely curious to what extend the societal divide extends into the armed forces. How can can there be trust among soldiers in combat situations if they are diametrically opposed on fundamental things like this.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've had people on here assure me that it's impossible, soldiers follow orders and are loyal to the constitution. Sure buds

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

Opposite statements. Either they follow orders or they are loyal to the constitution. Can't do both right now.

I can't fathom the industrial amounts of pure propagandium that Americans must have been huffing to think the military will ever be on their side. Blind and unconditional obedience is literally the only way militaries can function properly and everything about them is organized to promote that.

US military apologists (even before Trump) will say "but soldiers are legally obligated to follow the constitution first and must refuse unlawful orders" like Abu Ghraib didn't happen in my lifetime. We all know that 90 % of soldiers will wipe themselves with the original copy of the declaration of independence if Trump orders them to. And those that refuse will be dishonorably discharged, or worse.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would like to speak to some of those ~~cretins~~ ~~morons~~ ~~dumbasses~~ folks regarding some beach front property located in Kansas...

Spectacular views...

🙄 🤦‍♀️ 🖕 💩

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically Kansas has beach front property, rivers and lakes have beaches. Kansas is lacking oceanfront property though.

Source: I am a Californian who gets impressed by a puddle of water, I know what a body of water looks like and the features common to them.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, my bad...

Was, of course, thinking "oceanfront" but stupidly typed "beach front" instead... 🤦‍♀️ 🙄

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey it could be worse, you could be the jackass who named an area Mentone "beach" here in San Bernardino, fun fact it's not a fucken beach. Forest falls is more of a beach.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

WTF that's like 50-75 miles inland.....

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

You can have beaches pretty far inland all it since all a beach is is some sand on the shore of a water feature. The problem is that the water feature didn't really have anything that could be called a beach, which is funny cause some spots along Green Spot practically right next store do have what I'd call a beach.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Even so, what happens when it’s impossible to do both?

[–] just2look@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

The divide absolutely exists. There is a lot of conditioning for following orders and working as a team. That doesn't erase conflicting ideologies, beliefs, or even personality conflict. At the extreme the military will remove outliers from the military, but at the individual level you learn who you trust and who you can rely on. Then you do what you can to mitigate those who you don't trust.

Militaries all over the world also have a long history of killing their own people for not fitting whatever the group around them wants. Sometimes for justifiable reasons, like incompetent leaders likely to get their subordinates killed. Other times for things like someone being uncomfortable with blatant war crimes.

There is nothing magical or special about the military. They just have more weapons. So the solutions are violent more often than the average office job.