this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
240 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

71536 readers
4342 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jim3692@discuss.online -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Don't such satellites have a major flaw, that they revolve? Considering that earth is spherical, those satellites can only monitor some half of the earth each moment, given their sensors have such high FOV.

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

How is that a flaw? It just sounds like a design consideration...

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Yes that's how one satellite can image a lot of area.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Do you expect the satellite to see the whole earth?

You know it's night for like half of it, yea?

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

What are you talking about? There's only one side. /s

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not agreeing with their dumb point, but just pointing out: this satellite works on radar. I'm genuinely concerned how many people seem to be commenting without reading the article.

*yeah, not yea or nay. It isn't a vote.