this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
144 points (93.4% liked)

Programming

17450 readers
80 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why is this necessary? I thought we've moved past language-specific IDEs.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have? JetBrains never has stopped offering them.

Who wouldn't want an experience tailored to their main language? I certainly favor PyCharm over Ultimate

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

JetBrains is not representative of every editor / dev. Language servers mean I can use Emacs / Vim / VSCode / whatever else I want and have IDE features for whatever language I want.

[–] jvisick@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Just as JetBrains is not representative of every dev, neither are LSPs. Some developers want a specialized IDE for their language(s), some want a highly customized editor with their language servers. As long as you efficiently produce code that works, who cares what other people use?

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can do that if you want to :

Like many of our IDEs, the functionality of RustRover can be installed as a plugin in IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate.

But if you only care about a particular language/stack you can use the dedicated IDE, it's cheaper and the UX is optimized for your use case.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a JetBrains plugin. It is just for JetBrains applications, and it closed source, right? Language servers are basically the metric system of IDEs. I can go from Emacs to Vim to VSCode and just use rust-analyzer for my IDE backend.

I don't understand the benefit of using JetBrains specific plugins that only work with JetBrains.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because I (and many others) find their products to be far superior to the competition.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. I'm using PyCharm with the new UI, and watching my colleagues struggle with VSCode is a bit painful to see. Not saying you can't be productive with it, but why make your life harder than it needs to be?

[–] MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

Same here but with WebStorm.

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

JetBrains users kind of live in their own weird bubble. Of the ones I've worked with, a decent number didn't even know how to use git, they just relied on the built in vcs tools

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

And? Do you get high off of the smeeeelll of your own farts, sir madam?

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think there's something for everyone. Some people want one editor for everything, some want one tailored to their language needs

[–] sickday@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the right answer, and I wish more people would grasp that.

[–] MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

Tech has an abundance of people who really need to be right in an argument. I've had this same argument with a developer at a client company of mine. Just couldn't let it go when I said I was comfortable with the Jetbrains suite and used their language specific tooling instead of VSCode.

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yea, I was thinking the same. I have the JetBrains toolbox, and already have these installed:

  • Rider
  • RubyMine
  • PyCharm
  • GoLand
  • CLion

I don't really get why they need to make 10 different IDEs for every language, instead of just consolidating everything into a single UI/IDE.

For pricing it doesn't make that much sense, anyone that wants more than 2 JetBrains products is better off buying the entire toolbox.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm still waiting for Cobolilissimo and Fortransformer...

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know that you can use IntelliJ Idea Ultimate to get all of these in one package?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

All of the languages from their other IDEs are available as plugins: https://www.jetbrains.com/products/compare/?product=idea&product=idea-ce

[–] illectrility@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Totally agree but weren't they working on an all-in-one IDE? I think it was Fleet

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And there is already the Language Server Protocol, which basically everyone else uses.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The Jetbrains IDEs go further than many language servers do.

[–] steve@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is likely just rebranded intellij with some rust specific plugins and some UI adjustments like pycharm, goland, etc.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All the JetBrains IDEs feel like basically the same platform with different plugins and tweaks.

[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They wanted to showcase again that if you contribute to an open source project under a CLA, ie. the previous Rust plugin for Intellij, they will take your contributions, make them close source and sell them back to you.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

They don't require CLA, since it's MIT license. So what they showcase is the benefit of copyleft.

[–] sickday@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this IDE going to make it impossible to install the Rust plugin in their other IDEs? Like is there anything preventing a user from continuing to use the Rust plugin and CLion after this has been released?

[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No. The plugin will continue to work, but JB will no longer release new features and bug fixes for it.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can come in handy, for some people. I am certainly happy with VSCode

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

VSCode isn't language specific, is it? Why would they come in handy?

[–] sickday@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Almost all of these IDEs have language-specific features in them. PyCharm has Scientific tools (like SciView) for generating graphs using code and data. Rider features a pretty nice Windows Form builder for generating and creating GUIs for applications. Etc.

I can't imagine it being very useful or practical to unload all these language-specific plugins each time you open the program to write in a language that can't utilize those features.

[–] hellishharlot@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You build workspaces with vscode but the real magic is you never have to switch to visual studio or spend time configuring plugins for a new workspace each time you start a new project

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Because sometimes you have an irrepressible need to spend cash on an IDE?

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I am saying is that I don't need an IDE to program stuff. I am fine with VSCode with extensions. With extensions, VSCode can be a multi(programming)language IDE. I don't see the need to have different IDEs for different programming languages. They do have their benefits.

[–] gencha@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago