this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
215 points (96.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

12195 readers
1605 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Only 3 states Delaware, Montana, and New Jersey raise enough revenue from cars to fully cover their highway spending.

The remaining 47 states and the District of Columbia must make up the difference with tax revenues from other sources

By diverting general funds to roadway spending, the burden of paying for the roads falls on all taxpayers, including people who drive very little or may not drive at all.

Source: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/state-road-taxes-funding/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Per usual, so many hypocrites here. Without roads you would not exist. Your emergency services, your grocery stores deliveries, and the products you buy all use roads and highways. If you don't want a car or a road to drive on, move to a mountain away from everyone and stop bothering people.

[–] Thadrax@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

Yes, roads are important. Attributing costs to who or what is causing those costs is still a good idea.

Paying for roads is fine, paying for 10 lanes of roads that only exist because the real costs aren't included in all kinds of decision making is dumb.

[–] barnacul@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Wow, edgy take. You came here to fuckcars with a wild, untamed, edgy take like that?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I do think it's important to reject the neoliberal demand that all services pay for themselves. I think a heat map showing percentages of local/state and federal funds spent on non-car transit infrastructure would be more useful and interesting. Or, a heat map showing the percentage of roads in each state which the state is currently able to afford upkeep on. As the big issue with our road funding model is that it's easy to build, almost impossible to maintain.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

You can have all that without 10-lane highways.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 17 hours ago

yeah, roads, not highways