this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
177 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3073 readers
1455 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about we don’t expect black men to permanently give up their facial hair because of a fucking job.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'm down. Readiness doesn't need a razor shave, as evidenced by our Special Forces in the Middle East.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they had a threat of chemical warfare, they would have to shave too. You can't get a good gas mask seal with facial hair unless you use a ton of Vaseline and have time to prepare.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Yes, in those circumstances everyone needs to be clean shaven. But it's not an everyday thing and a Marine with the condition could deal with the problem afterwards.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Shaving was because of gas masks. The mask needs rubber-on-skin contact to make an airtight seal, and a beard prevents that from happening. If there’s a threat of chemical warfare, shaving chits get revoked.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

And yet, the Canadian military has absolutely no problem allowing our troops to have full beards.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah modern SCBAs don't rely on half-face masks anymore.