this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
4611 points (99.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
398 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The mental gymnastics are in response to copyright holders' gymnastics. They remove content, relocate it, put it behind tiered subscriptions, or sometimes effectively delete it from all legal avenues after owners/subscribers paid for it. So if paying for a subscription isn't owning it, as described in Amazon's fine print for example, then what do you do? It's a long-term rental subject to removal upon any licensing transfers. Sure, we get greedy once set up, but if legal options don't actually offer you any legal ownership due to legal gymnastics, then yeah, I'll do the mental gymnastics right back at them.

[–] Harpuajim@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's their IP, they can distribute it in any way they see fit. It doesn't entitle you to steal it just because you disagree with how it's distributed.

[–] _totally_toasted_@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you really believe that then why are you on a piracy forumn?

[–] FactorSD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's nuance in the pirate ranks my dude. Some people don't really believe in property rights at all, some people think that piracy is acceptable when you can't afford/obtain the original, some just like to try before they buy.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Some think it's ok for them to steal but not for them to be stolen from.

Edit: dont shoot the messenger

[–] Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I DO WHAT I WANT CAUSE A PIRATE IS FREE

[–] FactorSD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Hey, if you can't be consistent at least be honest.

[–] Harpuajim@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Primarily because I pirate the majority of media I consume.

[–] starchive@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How can it be stealing if downloading doesn’t take the content away from anyone else.

[–] Harpuajim@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

This is just another example of mental gymnastics when it comes to piracy.

[–] Jazsta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you strictly have to deprive others of content to be stealing? Taking away potential revenue, stealing someone's design, etc. are also forms of stealing. If a gaming company lifts some art someone shared and put it in their game without compensating the artist or getting permission, would that not be stealing? They're not taking away that content from anyone else - so is that ok?

[–] shallowthought@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that you do have to intend to permanently deprive for it to be theft. What you're describing is copyright infringement. Whether that's morally right is a different question but it's not stealing.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You’re getting downvoted but you’re 100% correct.

[–] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree. I'm American and I love the show "Taskmaster." I would like to give them money to watch it. They would like to receive my money. There have been legal complications for years. I've bought their physical board game from their website but as far as the show goes, yo ho ho!