This license has the peculiarity that any software implementation requires you to offer the source code, even if you only plan to use it privately. This makes it a stronger license than the AGPL in terms of copyleft. If the AGPL already scares away almost all companies, the SOWPL scares away almost everyone.

My question is, what would happen if free and/or open source software had the SOWPL? Would projects have to be forked? Would free and open source software die? Would we have to start from scratch again or hire lawyers to avoid problems?

I would like to know your response to this fictional scenario.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] The_sleepy_woke_dialectic@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What does that mean exactly? If I'm using your SOWPL program in a coffee shop and someone leans over my shoulder and asks for the source code I have to bluetooth it to them?

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

IANAL, but I feel that coffee shop case would not be different if the software were under AGPL... if you are providing a service to other people, even if "the other people" are the customers to your shop, it could be argued that under the terms of the AGPL (not to be confused with GPL) they should have the right to see the source of the service that they are making use of.

But if the SOWPL requirement really does apply to private code that isn't providing service to others, the implication would be that even if you are the only user (no coffee shop customer), and even if you are the only one who knows about it, you would still need to make the source code public in some way... which I feel this is very impractical and probably unenforceable anyway.

[–] The_sleepy_woke_dialectic@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I meant as a patron of the shop, using the software on my personal device for personal reasons

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Ah sorry, I misunderstood completely, I didn't read it right. For some reason I thought you were talking about the router / wifi service being SOWPL.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago

Or maintain a repos. Which would force people to create an account on one of the free VCS servers, pay for an account on a non-free one, or run their own.