213
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Thursday dubbed the House Freedom Caucus the “burn-it-all-down caucus,” a swipe at the conservative group that ousted her from its ranks over the summer.

“I’m not a member of the burn-it-all-down caucus anymore,” Greene told reporters. “I’m a greatly, very happily a free agent and I want to do my job here.”

Members of the caucus voted to boot Greene from their ranks over the summer after the Georgia Republican supported the debt limit bill that Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and President Biden crafted to avoid a default, which drew ire from many in the right flank — some of whom are members of the caucus.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 9 months ago

Is there a single more stupid bitch?

Genuinely, I want to know, because I don’t think there is

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago
[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

I genuinely did not realize this wasn't boebert.. Apparently it's easy to conflate the amount of stupid going on...

[-] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Right, this is the one who got into an argument with Boebert about which of them got to file impeachment charges. And, somehow, both of them got reelected after their first term where they were... them.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Well. yes. Yes it is. I have to constantly ask myself "which one is this again".... and then I find myself asking, why do I even care. They're both idiots. they're both annoying, and they're both both a symptom and a cause...

[-] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Can we criticize even shitty people without resorting to sexist remarks please? Lemmy feels like it should be above that kinda language. Call her a turd or whatever 💩

[-] 2d4_bears@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 9 months ago

It’s always disappointing to see people who think themselves reasonable delighting in the usage of slurs when given the opportunity to tear down someone they perceive as disliked by their community. It is much more damning to them than the object of their ire.

Greene is a symptom of the cancer metastasized on our civilization, but deploying gendered slurs against her is counterproductive and pitiful.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 10 points 9 months ago

It's the attacks on appearance for me.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 9 months ago

Pointless ones. She looks like a normal person. That she's got an infection of fascist brain worms is something you can call out directly.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I don't know... she looks like she has crazy eyes to me. I don't think that's sexist. I can think of plenty of crazy men with the similar look in their eyes.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago

There's a pretty big difference between saying someone has crazy eyes and the kind of attacks she draws regularly in center/left circles.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

1: Bitch isn’t a slur any more than dick is. That’s just an objectively false statement.

2: If someone is being a bitch, I’m going to call them a bitch - regardless of gender

Or would you prefer “cunt”?

[-] 2d4_bears@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately for you, you are not the authority on what is and isn’t a slur.

It has been used as a "term of contempt towards women" for "over six centuries", and is a slur that fosters sexism against women. It has been characterized as "an archaic word demeaning women since as early as the 15th century" that seeks to control women.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitch_(slang)

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Excuse me, could you please not insult turds by comparing them to that horrific person?!?!

[-] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I have a healthy, high-fiber diet so I'm sure if I shit in the woods it would be good for the local ecosystem. MTG can't hold a candle to my shit.

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Bless you. You be doin the Lord’s work.

[-] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago

Calling someone a bitch is no different than calling someone a dick or an asshole - and is not strictly tied to any gender. I’ll call anyone a bitch if they’re acting like one.

It would be different if I was casually referring to her as a bitch, like “I was talking to this one bitch” or something, but that’s not the case.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -3 points 9 months ago
[-] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

It depends on context. In this case it obviously is. If I were to say bitch please in a sassy way, it probably isn't.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I wouldn’t call her a “bitch”, but I would not disagree with the statement that she could be grouped in same category and class as Kyle’s Mom from South Park from the perspective of Eric Cartman

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago
[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

She knows exactly what she's doing. She's telling the stupid and hateful exactly what they want to hear, and she's getting all that fantastic attention she craves.

[-] jazir5@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Sydney Powell?

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
213 points (92.8% liked)

politics

18073 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS