this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
430 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

26229 readers
1646 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beeb@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

A lot of ui frameworks are based on tailwind and allow you to customize the components with more tailwind. It's really a win because:

  • it's not "just inline classes", it's a design system (spacing, colors, breakpoints etc are well structured and not random)
  • it is way less verbose than vanilla css and easier to remember
[–] scott@lemmy.org 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fair enough. What ui framework(s?) on tailwind do you like?

[–] brian@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

shadcn is the primary one for react at least. they've done a great job filling the space where you're trying to build up a design system but don't want to start from scratch, but they're great if you just want prebuilt components too

all the components build on something else like radix, and are pretty simple themselves. normally just the radix component with styles. Installing a component just copypastes the source into your project at configured locations.

if you've ever fought against something like mui to get it to fit design changes or change specific behavior, shadcn is great. at some point the extension points of a library aren't enough, but if you own all the code that'll never be a problem.

[–] dubbel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

I don't use react, but needed a decently looking frontend complement library that didn't look dated, and found basecoat, which is shadcn but without react to be really neat.

Might be interesting for the htmx crowd here.

[–] beeb@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I like daisyUI because it doesn't have any Javascript

[–] scott@lemmy.org 1 points 2 months ago

Oooh, that's nice. I might switch to that from bulma, it would reduce the packaged style size

[–] scott@lemmy.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tried it. It was terrible. Reverting.

[–] beeb@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

😁 To each their own I guess

[–] scott@lemmy.org 1 points 2 months ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 months ago

Oh wow, a framework that needs a framework.