this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
176 points (91.9% liked)

Flippanarchy

1339 readers
379 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross-posted from "TRUE communism!" by @Muaddib@sopuli.xyz in !politicalmemes@lemmy.world


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

You don't need hierarchies to defend against imperialism

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need hierarchies to defend against imperialism

Anarchist projects have all reverted to capitalism much faster than the Soviet Union did.

Not without being conquered by fascists or red fash.

You sure you don't need those hierarchies buddy? You suuuuuuuure?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, I don't want to help bring about a system which will only revert to capitalism on its own.

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So you're happy with a system that will revert to capitalism, your quibble is just over whether it's taken apart by internal or external forces. Yeah, real coherent ideology you got there.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not happy with a system that will revert to capitalism at all. I just think the material conditions are not always the same where anarchists won't come ahead against the counter-revolution, and when they do, they won't collapse through their own internal contradictions like ML regimes.

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

So AES states prove that socialist states always collapse and becomes capitalism, and the collapse of every anarchist state ever to outside of forces doesn't prove that anarchist states are incapable of defending themselves? I have that right? And that makes sense to you?

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

this is why people like me just laugh and call you a fucking child, because like, what are you even on? What does your revolutionary society look like? How is it organized?

You just out yourself as an ignorant, illiterate fuck who doesn't realize that political anarchism is about the abolition of unjust and arbitrary hierarchies, not some idealist bullshit ass "we need a non hierarchical society" and a belief that you just get there by fucking magic. You are going to need to have a political organization of some kind, and guess what? The establishment of that is inherently fucking hierarchical!

What makes it good is not being a hierarchy based on fucking nobility or property ownership or oppressive class relations, dipshit. You are better off jerking yourself to death in your goon cave than chasing after some platonic ideal of A Lack of Hierarchy when here in the fucking real world the bourgoisie, fascists and cops are closing the noose around your neck and mine.

I'd tell you to grow the fuck up but I know you're just going to keep crying about authority and hierarchy while every single fucking lying weaselly ass statement from your mouth assists the imperialists and the bourgeoisie, whether you know it or not

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How is it organized?

There's entire books about that. If you want to criticize something so passionately, you should understand what you're criticizing and read up on theory. Or ask your local (instance's) anarchists.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

There's entire books about that

no shit, and none of them say "and we abolish all hierarchy and live in peace and good vibes" like you and dipshit wanna pretend

[–] bort@hexbear.net 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

If you want a serious answer, I'd recommend looking up how the anarchist rural communes in Aragon functioned. They seemed to work really well, both in terms of equality and productivity, they just obviously couldn't survive the war.

If I get time I'll edit in some sources.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 1 points 9 minutes ago

im pretty sure they were organized by the trade unions which, gasp, had leaders 😔

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 12 hours ago

and we abolish all hierarchy

yes they do

and live in peace and good vibes

well i’m glad it doesn’t ignore the challenges of reality every system has to face. my impression from what i read of communist literature included stressing pragmatism over idealism (hopefully a good translation of 唯心主义), is that not the case? damned if it isn’t

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Tankies :"immature", "anakiddie", "liberal", "reactionary", "ignorant", "waaaa"

Also tankies : "what about that left unity doe?"

A tale repeated since the nonsense that is "on authority"

But thanks for reinforcing to the audience why one just not align with (nevermind trust) MLs.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They’re not calling anarchists idiots. They’re explicitly referring to you who started being combative right out of the gate with this dumb fucking meme

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, it's not like MLs have been calling anarchists who don't toe the line "infantile" (when not outright labeling them as liberals so as to have an excuse to purge them) since the times of Lenin. Totally isolated incident

Here's an advice, If you don't like this sort of of meme, maybe block anarchism comms outside of your instance instead of coming to in our space to antagonize and troll?

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao, why would I block anarchist comms when I consider them to be comrades? You’re the one being antagonistic, not anarchists as a whole.

If you don’t like hexbears calling you out on your shit then maybe you should be the one to disengage and defederate? Anarchists are always welcome on hexbear, but it’s clear that “tankies” aren’t welcome in your comms.

when not outright labeling them as liberals

You mean like what you’re doing to us in this meme? That’s a nice glass house you’ve got, try not to throw any rocks.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

The meme is not calling you "liberals" lol. Work on it your reading comprehension.

I'm not being antagonistic. I'm just shit posting for anarchists in an anarchist comm, y'all don't have to be here. Why would I defed you when y'all come in such threads and beautifully make my point for me?

Likewise anarchists that don't toe the campist line are absolutely not welcome in hexbear, y'all just get around that by calling them "liberals" before dogpiling and eventually banning them.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao, work on my reading comprehension? You’re using fucking poli-balls. If you think you’re “winning” this engagement, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What, you think because you're here along with your hexbear buddies and circlejerk each other, that you're "winning"?

[–] DirtyPair@hexbear.net 3 points 2 hours ago

creepy ass comment cringe

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 7 points 9 hours ago