this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
106 points (97.3% liked)

Slop.

552 readers
376 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago (11 children)

It at least feels, to significant numbers of people, that atomisation has significantly increased in the couple decades since 2005.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say the internet is responsible for most of this

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I'd have to agree. The internet combined with the capitalist model, anyway. Bourgeois control and mindless pursuit of profit, regardless of the not-directly-monetary benefits of previous methods, was an essential element.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

How do we fix it? I seriously think this will remain a problem in a socialist world. What do we do to mitigate atomisation created by people sitting at home on the internet during all the free time they have in-between going to work?

I don't think it's just capitalism at fault here. The internet existing at all will still play this role of removing people's need to go anywhere for social activity. The internet has essentially replaced all social activity people were seeking outside or with meeting up with friends previously.

I feel like (emphasis on feel, I'm just spit balling) reducing how much of the internet exists on mobile devices could help.

We had "social media" back in the day in the form of old school (non-news aggregator) webforums, live journal, Myspace, chat rooms, etc, but you had to sit at a specific desk in your house to utilize it. You probably weren't also playing videogames, you weren't streaming Netflix, you weren't doing it between every step in a multi step chore.

I think raising the barrier to entry a little (and getting rid of styles of content designed to addict people specifically, including most social media designed in the last decade or so, maybe a little further back even) makes it something people will do for a bit, before moving on to other activities that are possibly more social.

If Instagram is only checkable on a desktop, you're not going to ignore your friends to scroll it when you go out to a restaurant with them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)