this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

576 readers
591 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're carrying the gun expecting to have to defend yourself, slowing your ability to return fire is dangerous. As long as your gun is drop-safe (looking at you, P320), carrying with a round in the chamber is safe.

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah dropping it was one thing I thought, the other was if the trigger is accidentally snagged? Or is there a safety mechanism involved as well that makes it safer to carry chambered?

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For a pistol, you protect against trigger pulls with a holster that fully covers the trigger so nothing can touch it. You can also use a pistol with a manual safety, but that's not in vogue in the US any more because Glock got popular and now everybody thinks sweeping a safety off when you draw a weapon somehow adds time to the draw. For a long gun, you just use the safety and the trigger won't fire the gun.

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah I see. Glocks don't have a safety? I'm surprised they are so popular then. Or maybe it's evidence that a safety is obsolete?

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have a "trigger" safety which prevents the trigger from moving if it's not depressed squarely on the front. They're also drop-safe. Most people will tell you a safety on a handgun is obsolete these days, but I don't agree. Fortunately a lot of manufacturers will still have thumb safety equipped models available, although not all of them.

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see, thank u for teaching me! frog-no-pretext

[–] footfaults@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They have a trigger safety which blocks the trigger from being pulled unless you have your finger in the trigger, then a set of internal mechanisms that also prevent the striker from hitting the cartridge without having the trigger pulled. It consists of:

  • a striker block that must be lifted by fully pulling the trigger, in order to allow the striker to access the rear of the cartridge
  • The striker is brought to full cock as part of the trigger pull, and released. At rest it is in a half-cock position where even if the striker block fails, it does not have enough energy to set off the cartridge